Hon. Kimberly Todd See Rating Details

Circuit Court
Pinellas County
6th Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Kimberly Todd


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: FL3688
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge was consistently unfair and unprofessional, eventually having to recuse herself for violating the most basic Rules of Civil Procedure and Judicial Administration, such as not allowing one party to testify, have witnesses, or enter evidence.

Litigant

Comment #: FL3525
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
She gave two different rear amounts of child support based on one divorce order, then used one to jailing and another to suspending driving license. She denied the document on docket entry and inside the file had ever been filed. She processed secret jailing by issuing the jailing order on fabricated case number. She jail cancer patient to block cancer treatment in order process alternative death penalty. She forced the parties to transfer real estate property while no document was filed. She is a piece of garbage, not in legal field but a garbage human-being of lying, faking, heartless and lawless. Shame you.