Hon. Kelly J. McKibben See Rating Details

Circuit Court
Brevard County
18th Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   2.5 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Kelly J. McKibben


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: FL3577
Rating:2.5
Comments:
This Judge is the worst i have very seen in over five years of dealing with brevard county courts. While waiting my turn as a man to go in front i watched four other hearings and all men where discredited and all woman where thought of as the truth tellers. I am pro se and she holds me to a higher standard than the lawyers my evidence had to be clear and convincing and the woman was good on her word

Litigant

Comment #: FL3484
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge made decisions, not based on fact in my case, but based on her opinion, swayed by blatant lies from the other party and did not make the other party comply with her order to both of us. Really a joke. Shouldnt be on the bench.