Hon. Elisabeth Adams See Rating Details

Circuit Court
Lee County
20th Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.4 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Please type what you see below:


What others have said about Hon. Elisabeth Adams


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: FL4968
Out of chambers comes this rough older than middle aged woman attitude WOW. power trip.. she will allow all kinds of banter from plaintiff nothing from the other side. Had to rule on behalf of the defendants, she didn't like that. An attempt to shut you down after the ruling are threats from her. Appearance first and foremost wow, like a old mess

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: FL4266
This judge is lazy and generally biased in her ruling. Her docket schedule is stretched out months due to her lack of productivity. Then, he rulings take another six months to write. She is extremely biased in her rulings against men in general. In the face of clearly contemptuous behavior and abusive behavior she bends over to give females favor. This is even true when the father was the primary caregiver and the female was hands off and emotionally distant. Its disgusting. She asks for the input of experts, then if they don't favor the female she completely ignores their input. She wastes litigants money on needless lawyer fees as she in no way attempts to quickly resolve matters and often forces litigation to be reheard and appealed due to her faulty judgments. She has no place on the bench.


Comment #: FL4014
Very biased, seems unable to follow facts of the case, does not seem to understand the letter of the law or does not care and just hope plaintiffs will not appeal. Numerous lawyers descibed her as lazy and inefficient.