Hon. James Martz See Rating Details

Circuit Court
Palm Beach County
15th Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. James Martz


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: FL3431
Rating:1.0
Comments:
i can't give him a zero. He is Biased. His JA put altered ex-parte communications into court records to CYA after they were confronted about the inappropriateness of some ex-parte communications. The Judges JA agreed to keep a litigant "in the loop". Since when is the court considered in the loop with any litigant. Especially a litigant that got caught commiting perjury at least 10 times. 32 minutes of testimony missing from a hearing. Judge Martz is disrespectful to women. Judge Martz needs to go to animal court and continue hearing cases about parrots, because the decisions he makes in family cases affects children and families. Judge Martz doesn't find a problem with litigants entering perjured testimony, orally and in writing, when it was being revealed in court coincidentally the hearing stops being recorded. The the hearing resumes recording when the father is represented in a more positive light. the court hearing stops recording at 2:57 pm and resumes recording at 3:31 pm. that is a RED FLAG. The ability to alter a court transcipt is HUGE futhermore why would a honest Judge want to, or if it happened accidentally acknowledge and correct it