Hon. Lisa T. Munyon

Circuit Court
Orange County
9th Circuit

Rate a judge
Attorney Average Rating:   1.7 - 16 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 51 rating(s)


General Rating Criteria

* Temp. Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Sch. Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Indu. Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Comp. Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punct. Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* Ab-Pr. General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* Ab-Tr. General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flex Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
    

Criminal Case Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Ev-Cr. Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Bail General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Plea Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
Inc.-Pr. General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
Inc.-Tr. General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
Inc.-S. General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Case Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Ev-Cv. Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Settle Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
Inc. General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
    
  

General Rating Criteria

Criminal Case Rating Criteria
(if applicable)

Civil Case Rating Criteria
(if applicable)

EvaluatorIDDate*Temp.*Sch.*Indu.*Comp.*Punct.*Ab-Pr.*Ab-Tr.Flex
Criminal Defense Lawyer2715505/25/201411 1  1 
Civil Litigation - Private2488501/13/20142       
Civil Litigation - Private2324009/11/20131121 111
Civil Litigation - Private2062703/18/201311111111
Civil Litigation - Private1505605/28/201211111111
Criminal Defense Lawyer1482905/04/20121 11 131
Criminal Defense Lawyer1482605/04/20121 11 131
Criminal Defense Lawyer1432304/03/2012        
Criminal Defense Lawyer1424203/26/20121111 11 
Criminal Defense Lawyer1408803/16/20121  1    
Civil Litigation - Private1400003/13/201211111111
Criminal Defense Lawyer1398203/13/20121010 1010101010
Criminal Defense Lawyer1397003/12/2012     11 
Criminal Defense Lawyer1396903/12/2012   1 11 
Criminal Defense Lawyer1395703/12/20121  1 11 
Criminal Defense Lawyer1395603/12/20121 11 11 
Criminal Defense Lawyer1395303/12/2012        
Criminal Defense Lawyer1394503/12/201211111111
Category Average  1.72.11.11.62.81.71.92.1
   
ID*Ev-Cr.BailPleaInc.-Pr.Inc.-Tr.Inc.-S.
2715511  11
24885      
23240      
20627111111
15056      
148291  111
148261  111
14323      
142421 1111
140881     
14000111111
1398210     
139701 1111
139691 11  
139571 1111
13956111111
13953      
13945111111
 1.71.01.01.01.01.0
ID*Ev-Cv.SettleInc.Average
2715511 1.0
24885   2.0
2324011 1.1
206271111.0
150561111.0
148291111.3
148261111.3
14323   0.0
142421111.0
140881  1.0
140001111.0
1398210  10.0
139701111.0
139691111.0
139571  1.0
139561111.0
13953   0.0
139451111.0
 1.61.01.01.5

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

Non-attorney Rating
(if applicable)

EvaluatorIDDateJudgeIDOvr.AverageReadComment
Other3074711/04/2014179111.0Read Comment
Litigant3073511/04/2014179111.0Read Comment
Other2804207/12/2014179111.0Read Comment
Other2328009/15/2013179111.0Read Comment
Other1709808/29/2012179155.0Read Comment
Other1708408/28/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1652008/01/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1492705/14/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1492605/14/2012179111.0 
Other1484005/05/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1482505/04/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1482205/04/2012179111.0Read Comment
Litigant1482005/04/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1481905/04/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1481705/04/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1481605/04/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1481405/04/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1434304/05/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1424403/26/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1424003/26/20121791  Read Comment
Other1422503/25/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1410103/17/20121791  Read Comment
Other1409403/16/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1408903/16/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1402003/14/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1401403/14/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1401203/14/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1401003/14/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1400903/13/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1400403/13/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1400303/13/20121791  Read Comment
Other1400203/13/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1400103/13/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1399903/13/20121791  Read Comment
Other1399803/13/20121791  Read Comment
Other1399703/13/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1399403/13/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1399303/13/20121791  Read Comment
Other1399103/13/20121791  Read Comment
Other1399003/13/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1398903/13/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1398603/13/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1398403/13/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1398103/13/20121791  Read Comment
Other1398003/13/20121791  Read Comment
Other1397903/13/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1397703/13/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1397603/13/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1397203/13/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1397103/13/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1396803/12/20121791  Read Comment
Other1396403/12/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1396303/12/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1396203/12/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1396003/12/20121791  Read Comment
Other1395503/12/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1395103/12/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1394903/12/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1394803/12/2012179111.0Read Comment
Court Staff1394703/12/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1394603/12/2012179111.0Read Comment
Other1394403/12/2012179111.0Read Comment
Category Average   1.11.1