Hon. Tanya Davis Wilson

County Court
Orange County
9th Circuit

Rate a judge
Attorney Average Rating:   3.1 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 14 rating(s)


General Rating Criteria

* Temp. Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Sch. Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Indu. Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Comp. Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punct. Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* Ab-Pr. General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* Ab-Tr. General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flex Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
    

Criminal Case Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Ev-Cr. Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Bail General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Plea Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
Inc.-Pr. General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
Inc.-Tr. General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
Inc.-S. General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Case Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Ev-Cv. Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Settle Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
Inc. General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
    
  

General Rating Criteria

Criminal Case Rating Criteria
(if applicable)

Civil Case Rating Criteria
(if applicable)

EvaluatorIDDate*Temp.*Sch.*Indu.*Comp.*Punct.*Ab-Pr.*Ab-Tr.Flex
Civil Litigation - Private7325407/27/2019        
Criminal Defense Lawyer7111706/24/201911518118
Category Average  1.01.05.01.08.01.01.08.0
   
ID*Ev-Cr.BailPleaInc.-Pr.Inc.-Tr.Inc.-S.
73254      
711177     
 7.0     
ID*Ev-Cv.SettleInc.Average
73254   0.0
71117   3.1
    1.6

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

Non-attorney Rating
(if applicable)

EvaluatorIDDateJudgeIDOvr.AverageReadComment
Other12657605/01/202422653  Read Comment
Other11953007/17/20232265311.0Read Comment
Other10061411/16/20212265322.0Read Comment
Other8802507/18/20202265311.0Read Comment
Litigant8536404/30/20202265311.0Read Comment
Other8155301/13/20202265311.0Read Comment
Other7799010/22/20192265311.0Read Comment
Other7435508/14/2019226531010.0Read Comment
Litigant7246507/13/20192265311.0Read Comment
Other7225907/10/20192265311.0Read Comment
Litigant7196007/05/20192265311.0Read Comment
Other6150811/12/20182265311.0Read Comment
Other5602805/15/20182265311.0Read Comment
Other5469003/14/20182265311.0Read Comment
Other5321112/20/20172265311.0Read Comment
Category Average   1.71.7