Hon. Jayme B. Sullivan See Rating Details
Magistrate Judge
County Court
Canyon County
Third Judicial District
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Jayme B. Sullivan


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: ID62
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Not at all impartial, did not consider best interests of the child in custody case. Wrote a scathing, vile, horrific decision regarding mother based on lies told by father with no proof. Took away all but 3 weeks A YEAR visitation from mother. Sullivan was mad that she was called out by the defending lawyer for making a poor decision in the case. She took it out on the defendant and now the child is paying for her revenge.

Litigant

Comment #: ID57
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
constant mistakes in the handling of case. very inconstant with the laws in Idaho. Needs more training in laws and how to handle special cases

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: ID56
Rating:1.0
Comments:
An awful judge on protecting our children. She is mean, inappropriate and uneducated on how to keep children safe.

Litigant

Comment #: ID55
Rating:1.0
Comments:
not a stable judge that should be decidin the fate of our children. she is a mistake that Idaho will pay for through our children