Hon. Lee Ann S. Hill See Rating Details
Associate Judge
Circuit Court
McLean County
Eleventh Judicial Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.3 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Lee Ann S. Hill


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: IL3768
Rating:1.0
Comments:
God forbid if you are a male in this womans court room. She will do whatever she can to supress any rights you have will violate HIPPA laws will discriminate against Disabled Veterans and support drug convicted mothers.

Other

Comment #: IL2915
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
The case of little Mikey Cadena beggars belief. The Judge might think that we don't know the whole case, which is true. However, we have seen the video at police station which is all we need to see and hear to know that you Judge Hill have made a dreadful mistake. Also, I have researched this case, as have so many more people, to know that Amber Buck was arrested for running a Meth Lab, whilst Mikey was in her care. fact!
Mikey's reaction at the police station, which i assume you've seen, must've proved to you that this little boy is petrified of his own mother, therefore, making your decision a wrong.
So to sum up - Little Mikey was a happy little boy with his father and grandmother, couldn't be unhappier and then you made the judgement to put him back into harms way, yet again. Why?

Please, please put this right before it's to late.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: IL2439
Rating:1.3
Comments:
Horrible, tempermental and unprofessional judge. She cannot hold an unbiased opinion or courtroom. She believes a liar and disrespects the other parent. She holds a grudge if you make a complaint and you will never get a fair trial. She is great friends with certain lawyers and gaurdians and if your lawyer is not on her country club list of pals, you are screwed. She needs to retire. She does not understand anything about family matters. Definitly does not care about best interest of the child!

Other

Comment #: IL2309
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge should have never been given the opportunity to be a judge in family law. She does not care that a mother alienates a father, she does not care if the mother denies the father is parental rights, however what she does believe in is making a father pay a female who does not need to be a mother even after attempting suicide in front of her kids on several occasion, what she does believe in is screwing every possible father she can out of time with there children just to further her fat pockets. Maybe this is why this judge has been pulled from family laws as she is VERY biased towards men. She will continue to favor mothers even when they are a danger to the kids and herself. She will continue to make men pay for mistakes the other party has made She should have never been a family law judge with the way she acts and carries on in the courtroom. Hopefully she is gone for good.

Other

Comment #: IL1710
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Without a doubt completely biased judge, if you are a male you will not get due process nor will your civil rights be upheld, this person should not be a judge period. My experience has been completely awful from day one in this person's court room. I guess because I have a penis I must be a less loving parent. What a joke. Its a place where the best interest of the children is code for the male is going to pay support period. It doesn't matter who is right or not... friends are also played by this judge, it is unbelievable the favoritism and bias in the woman's court room. It's not just myself but I have spoken with many fathers with the same experience.