Hon. Lee Ann S. Hill See Rating Details
Associate Judge
Circuit Court
McLean County
Eleventh Judicial Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.1 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 7 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Lee Ann S. Hill


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: IL3768
Rating:1.0
Comments:
God forbid if you are a male in this womans court room. She will do whatever she can to supress any rights you have will violate HIPPA laws will discriminate against Disabled Veterans and support drug convicted mothers.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: IL2932
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This person doesn't belong working in any judicial system, period. Her actions regarding the Cadena vs. Buck case say it all. When you see a small child break down in tears when they're told they have to go live with the "parent" they're terrified of, you don't send them anyway. This "judge" needs prison time.

Other

Comment #: IL2916
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge is anything but honorable. How can a person put in innocent little boy back in such a harmful environment. Take him away from the only people who he felt safe with. Little Mikey needs to be back with his father before anymore harm comes to him. I hope someday that Judge Lee Ann Hill will be held accountable for all her wrongdoings as well as everyone who had a hand in putting this boy back into the harmful
environment of his abuser. Amber Buck needs help but instead of getting her the help she needs HER family chooses to enable her drug addiction and her abusiveness ways toward her son. As well as use this little boy as leverage
to hurt his dad. She certainly doesn’t care about this little boy. Mike Sr is the only one who is truly looking out for his son best interest.

Other

Comment #: IL2915
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
The case of little Mikey Cadena beggars belief. The Judge might think that we don't know the whole case, which is true. However, we have seen the video at police station which is all we need to see and hear to know that you Judge Hill have made a dreadful mistake. Also, I have researched this case, as have so many more people, to know that Amber Buck was arrested for running a Meth Lab, whilst Mikey was in her care. fact!
Mikey's reaction at the police station, which i assume you've seen, must've proved to you that this little boy is petrified of his own mother, therefore, making your decision a wrong.
So to sum up - Little Mikey was a happy little boy with his father and grandmother, couldn't be unhappier and then you made the judgement to put him back into harms way, yet again. Why?

Please, please put this right before it's to late.

Other

Comment #: IL2862
Rating:1.0
Comments:
A disgrace to any lawful system. In her own words on a transcript regarding a child "I don't have time for this'. I am sorry, you don't have time for what? Doing your job? You should lose your job and your benefits before you retire. Entering a warrant illegally into a federal database! A mother who had her charges swept under the rug by her father and she abused her son and you give him back? Maybe you are another paid off Judge!

Other

Comment #: IL2833
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Any judge faced with overwhelming evidence of child abuse that would send that small child back to his abuser is not fit to be a judge. Heartless, soul-less and obviously blind to the injustice of child abuse.

Other

Comment #: IL2815
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I wish with everything in me YOU ago through the trauma that innocent boy will go through every day now because of you. Absolute POS you deserve anything and everything bad that comes at you

Other

Comment #: IL2814
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This woman is anything but honerable. Allowing an innocent child to go back to the neglectful and abusibe hands of his mother. The safety and well being of a child should be any judge's number one priority. If you have a position of authority and start making self serving decisions, that is when you step down. Shame on her.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: IL2439
Rating:1.3
Comments:
Horrible, tempermental and unprofessional judge. She cannot hold an unbiased opinion or courtroom. She believes a liar and disrespects the other parent. She holds a grudge if you make a complaint and you will never get a fair trial. She is great friends with certain lawyers and gaurdians and if your lawyer is not on her country club list of pals, you are screwed. She needs to retire. She does not understand anything about family matters. Definitly does not care about best interest of the child!

Other

Comment #: IL2309
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge should have never been given the opportunity to be a judge in family law. She does not care that a mother alienates a father, she does not care if the mother denies the father is parental rights, however what she does believe in is making a father pay a female who does not need to be a mother even after attempting suicide in front of her kids on several occasion, what she does believe in is screwing every possible father she can out of time with there children just to further her fat pockets. Maybe this is why this judge has been pulled from family laws as she is VERY biased towards men. She will continue to favor mothers even when they are a danger to the kids and herself. She will continue to make men pay for mistakes the other party has made She should have never been a family law judge with the way she acts and carries on in the courtroom. Hopefully she is gone for good.

Other

Comment #: IL1710
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Without a doubt completely biased judge, if you are a male you will not get due process nor will your civil rights be upheld, this person should not be a judge period. My experience has been completely awful from day one in this person's court room. I guess because I have a penis I must be a less loving parent. What a joke. Its a place where the best interest of the children is code for the male is going to pay support period. It doesn't matter who is right or not... friends are also played by this judge, it is unbelievable the favoritism and bias in the woman's court room. It's not just myself but I have spoken with many fathers with the same experience.