"The Robing Room: IN State Judges

Hon. Marie L. Kern	See Rating Details
Magistrate Judge County Court
Marion County 13	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 1.0 - 1 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: 1.0 - 3 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Marie L. Kern

Comments

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: IN138
Rating:1.0

Comments:
This judge is very biased against women. She was previously a paternity court judge and makes it very clear that she is in full favor of the father. Especially if the father has an attorney and mother doesn't. She makes her decision before she even hears the mother's side. Even with confirmed evidence of contempt on the father's side, she over looks this. Someone should be investigating her court room habits and how she treats these mothers. She has no interest in how her decisions effect these kids.

Litigant

Comment #: IN109
Rating:1.0

Comments:
The most disrespectful and bias judge on this earth. She does not follow trial rules & should do herself some justice by removing herself from the bench before she causes herself some real damage.

Litigant

Comment #: IN67
Rating:1.0

Comments:
This judge is very bias on decision making, and fail to hear the side of the honest person. She gave father all favor, and fail to truly read, or hear the truth of the case. In this decision making, she took away my child for life. And this has caused a loss that may never be able to regain. She needs to be removed from the courts, as she is biased against women. I will fight to get my son back, no matter what.

Litigant

Comment #: IN64
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Demonstrates clear pattern of extreme bias in favor of fathers. Ignores evidence if it doesn't agree with her agenda. Went into trial twice now before her and her mind was already made up before litigants even entered court room. Refused to even hear my side, and immediately agreed with my abusive ex. Should be disbarred for pattern of poor, biased judgements.