Hon. Gregory A. Hulse See Rating Details
Judge
District Court
Dallas County
District 5
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Gregory A. Hulse


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: IA33
Rating:1.0
Comments:
TOOK ALL MY KIDS FROM ME. TWO AT A TIME AND TWO YEARS APART AFTER THE ABSENT FATHER FROM 15 YEARS OF ABANDONMENT CLAIMS ABUSE!!! I HAVE NEVER SEEN MY CHILDREN SINCE JUDGE HULSE TOOK FIRST 2 KIDS 5 YRS AGO AND BELIEVED TWINS WERE NOT IN SCHOOL BY FALSE ALLEGATIONS BY A MAN THAT WASN'T IN THE SAME STATE AND GAVE THEM TO THE EX IN AN EXPARTE HEARING!! HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN YANKED FROM THE BENCH INSTEAD OF GETTING TO RETIRE!! I WILL BE SUING HIM IN A FEDERAL LAWSUIT VERY SOON ALONG WITH OTHER JUDGES IN THIS DISTRICT!

Litigant

Comment #: IA20
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
just Shrugged her shoulders when I told him that my daughter was raped by four boys while in my ex-husband's care and he gave primary away from me that Iin almost three years because of thisjudge put in the order that if the two children didn't want to see me then they didn't have to and I have not seen my children in almost three years because of this judge. I have not seen my twins in 373 days because the judge doesn't care that my ex-husband course them onto a plane to run away to Iowa so that he could Forum shop for the same judge that will hand down the same sentence. my ex told judge hold that I did not have my kids registered for school in Texas which was a lie and then I had three CPS reports from three different states which was a lie and the judge took primary way from me again and gave to him and saw my children once a year if that!! judge allows evidence to be presented in a non evidentiary hearing and does not allow the plaintiffs to be in the courtroom when this is being done