Hon. Susan Oram See Rating Details
Chief Judge
District Court
Kennebec County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Susan Oram


Comments


Court Staff

Comment #: ME21
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge should not be on the bench because she has no clue about children's civil rights. She is mean -spirited in the courtroom and favors attorneys that are deadbeat fathers. Regardless of what they do, she will rule in their favor.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: ME17
Rating:1.0
Comments:
In 2003, Susan Oram, was a CMO. She was the Case Management Officer in charge of my Settlement conference. My Lawyer did not defend me. She would not let me speak. I was emotionally traumatized in court. She allowed me to be put into Duress. I was denied access to the corporation with all my benefits and the benefits for my children. I was forced to pick up a second practice and had an auto accident from sheer exhaustion. I no am left with $934.00 per month to live off of and a child who has needed medical care for the last 12 years.There are no food stamps and no medical care. She denied our Rights to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. She is now a Judge. She has no right to be on the bench or practicing law.