Hon. Audrey A. Creighton See Rating Details
Associate District Judge
Circuit Court
Montgomery County
6th Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   3.7 - 15 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Audrey A. Creighton


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD3720
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
You know you want to eat Judge Creighton Pussy Peter why you keep posting about her!!!! You know she got some good pussy! Rick went crazy off it. Email her see if she send you some of her extra tampons! So you can stick them up your bitch ass wanna be female! Faggot! Leaking butt! You stalk her all fucking year. Posting non-stop Judge Creighton is that bitch! She is in your head! So the fuck what! She hooked up with Rick Ugly ass! She grown ass woman and can do whatever the fuck she wants. You mother fuckers act line she committed murder.

Prosecutor

Comment #: MD3716
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Old Chinese Proverb -- "A liar is not to be believed, even when might be telling the truth."
Now that Creighton has revealed herself to be a pathological liar, does anyone really believe she was "kidnapped" as she says, or is this yet again another fabrication of hers to cover up her crimes? Why else choose a convict for a boyfriend, if not to make it all the easier to place blame him if they get caught? But regardless of what actually happened that night in her BMW, her history of dishonesty shows her as grossly unfit to be a judge.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD3715
Rating:1.0
Comments:
A judge who fraternizes with and benefits from LaRaza, a racist organization that practices invidious discrimination. Doesn't jusicial ethics require that judges disqualify themselves when deciding cases that might benefit clients of such organizations or even give the appearance of such bias? But then again, since when have the rules ever prevented Judge Creighton from holding herself above the law?

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD3714
Rating:1.0
Comments:
It doesn't take a genius to see this judge for what she is. Is it any surprise that others have accused her of being one who is not above tampering with the evidence? Who else but a thoroughly dishonest, corrupt and grossly unfit judge would constantly hack into this site to delete specific evidence of this judge's profoundly unjust and absurd rulings, such as the following:

One of Creighton's first cases on the bench was a simple motor vehicle tort claim in which a citizen was rammed at 96 m.p.h. and permanently maimed for life by an illegal alien (a “landscaper” who spoke no English) after he ran the intersection which the citizen had properly entered on a green light.
This was shortly after she attended a lavish reception in honor of her appointment to the bench by CASA de Maryland, the local affiliate of National Council of LaRaza(the “Race”), an organization that has been called “dangerous” and “inherently racist” by the late Caesar Chavez among others. From that point on it became abundantly clear to Judge Creighton on what side her bread was buttered.
In that case, marked by extreme bias shown by the judge throughout trial, Judge Creighton ruled that it was not the illegal, but rather the citizen who was at fault, for not driving fast enough to get out of the way of the illegal alien who blasted into the intersection.
She further violated Canons of Judicial Ethics, first by her failure to disclose her Conflict of Interest at the start of the trial and recuse herself, and then her cover-up of a felony known to her to have been committed by the defense attorney which was material to that case, which she not only declined to remedy but failed to report as required under Canon 3F.
Most revealing about Maryland’s judicial system is that in spite of the Commission on Judicial Disabilities’ knowledge of Judge Creighton’s misfit for a position on the bench, her criminal cover-up, her history of dishonesty, and the impartiality and impropriety she brought with her to the bench, they did nothing, instead letting her rise to a level of her own incompetence.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD3713
Rating:1.0
Comments:
According to the Sentinel Newspaper, Creighton has hired a high-profile criminal defense attorney to represent her. Are criminal charges against her now pending, for her perjury, witness intimidation and/or sexual predator crimes against those who were teenagers at the time? Has Senning been talking to criminal investigators about Creighton's other crimes? The plot thickens.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD3710
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Audrey Creighton must resign. Anyone who exhibits the kind of unconscionable, predatory behavior that she has shown via her relationship with Rickly Senning is in desperate need of psychiatric care.

Indisputably, Judge Creighton does not possess good judgment; ergo, she should not be in a position of power where she is able to determine other peoples' fates. She must step down. Period.

No excuses. She lied on an official police report; she harbored a violent criminal; she failed to recuse herself and she engages in judicial retaliation against those Marylanders who dare call her out on her criminality.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD3709
Rating:1.0
Comments:
A dishonest and shameless hypocrite who preaches rule of law, but does not practice rule of law. Not in her rulings, nor in her so-called private life.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD3660
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Not even a pretext of principled decision making. In a case which opposition insurance company lawyer refused to provide discovery or answer interrogatories, a motion to compel and/or for sanctions (which inexplicably had not been ruled upon for nearly a year) and a renewed motion in the interim, were filed. On the day of the trial Judge Creighton refused to provide any remedy whatsoever to the outstanding motions, or even to reschedule the trial date until after compliance with discovery, because "the matter's already set-in for trial." Her verdict (surprise, surprise) went on to reward the defendant's insurance company (their lawyer even joked during recess that the "fix was in") despite overwhelming photographic evidence and testimony which should have been a slam-dunk for the plaintiff.
As author Brian Khan recently pointed out, when not only politicians but judges are allowed to receive gifts in unlimited amounts, how can a litigant really expect any justice when he goes up against deep-pocketed corporations and insurance companies?
[Redacted by Ed.]

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD3606
Rating:1.0
Comments:
As those who practice in MoCo's Circuit Court by now well know, as well as those who risk arguing their case before her, Audrey Creighton not only has a history of bad decisions, but absurd and shameless decisions, both on and off the bench.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD3550
Rating:1.0
Comments:
As previously noted on this site, The Washington Post on 7/15/14 reported that Audrey Creighton is now under investigation by the Commission on Judicial Disabilities. What they did not report is that this is not the first time that she has been before the CJD on ethics charges. Not only did the Commission fail to do its job the last time around, the nominating committee failed miserably in its vetting process, and/or Creighton lied to them about her past.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD3536
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Not the brightest bulb on the bench. Far from it! In District Court, whenever a decision was required, she would announce a recess, as if to make a call from chambers to whoever was advising her. When returning to the bench, more often than not, still she couldn't get it right. How did she ever get to be a judge?

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD3434
Rating:9.3
Comments:
I had a trial with Judge Creighton and was very impressed with the way she handled the matter. She made appropriate inferences, listened to the witnesses, and was cognizant of the law. She took the matter under advisement for approximately 30 minutes, during which time she thoroughly reviewed the evidence and made an intelligent ruling.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD3412
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Creighton lacks even the most basic understanding of trial mechanics, she seems to lack an appreciation for the law, and she is overwhelmingly unimpressive as a jurist. She didn't belong on the District Court bench and certainly is unqualified to sit in the Circuit Court.

Other

Comment #: MD3328
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
The comments posted cannot be deleted by any Judge. Perhaps the reason the website is removing the comments is because the comments left are vulgar. The purpose of this website is for the people, law officials or lawyers to comment on a case that was held in front of a specific judge. Therefore, people can be aware how a judge proceeds in rulings or etc. This is not a forum to discuss the public life of any judge.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD3250
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge Creighton lacks even the most basic understanding of trial mechanics, she seems to lack an appreciation for the law, and she is overwhelmingly unimpressive as a jurist. She didn't belong on the District Court bench and certainly is unqualified to sit in the Circuit Court.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD2962
Rating:9.7
Comments:
Smart woman, good lawyer and good judge.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD2654
Rating:9.0
Comments:
Judge Creighton is a thoughtful, dignified and respectable member of the Circuit Court bench.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD2321
Rating:9.3
Comments:
Judge Creighton will likely exceed the expectations generated by her high levels of legal acumen and judicial management.

Perhaps the governor should be more consistent in his appointments.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD2315
Rating:8.4
Comments:
She is kind, very smart and caring. She is fair and understanding. Great judge. I heard she can sing too!