Hon. Mary C. Reese See Rating Details
Associate District Judge
Circuit Court
Howard County
5th Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.1 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Mary C. Reese


Comments


Other

Comment #: MD2275
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
She wouldn't even give me a chance to defend myself. The plaintiff was blatantly lying in court. His evidence proved that he was guilty.

Other

Comment #: MD2237
Rating:1.0
Comments:
@MD2234: Have you thought of reaching out to one of the many women's advocacy groups in Howard County? Or directing the victim to do so? If you google Judge Mary Reese, you will see a group of moms who speak about the same concerns they have in regards to Judge Reese's ability to maintain "the letter of the law in her courtroom without bias," and which states that Judge Mary Reese is one of the legal "predators" who "puts fear into the remaining members of our local legal establishment" who are trying to maintain the integrity of the court. There are many more like Judge Reese in our system who are beginning to outnumber those in Howard County who try to uphold the standards of the law. Some resources that question Judge Reese as a fair judge are listed on Moms Fighting Howard County Court Corruption. (See also Peck vs. Peck, Irani vs. Irani, Bouma vs. Bouma, and Alms vs. Alms.) It sounds like you have witnessed yet another grievance to be filed.
Judge Reese has her hands in with other groups, such as a pro-life advocacy group, but the air of her courtroom shows her allegiance more to the politics of Howard County's elected officials, and sadly the state prosecutors have less to offer the judges listed along with Judge Reese than defense attorneys, who are often paid big bucks by their Howard County clientele.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/187690052/The-Names-of-the-alleged-Corrupt-Predators-in-Maryland%E2%80%99s-Howard-County-Court-System

Prosecutor

Comment #: MD2234
Rating:1.1
Comments:
This judge has made a severely inaccurate decision in a criminal case regarding domestic violence. Judge Reese was unable to base her findings on the testimony of the State's attorney's witness and victim, and she didn't use the police officer's testimony that the defendant admitted to physical violence that led to his arrest. Judge Reese instead implemented her own feelings about the witness, and made a comment that re-vicitimized the State's witness. It is very concerning that the judge's findings could allow the defendant access to his victim, and this time it could be a much more severe injury that she suffers. At that time, what will Judge Mary Reese say about the only victim she saw when finding the abuser not guilty, and stating that the abused woman was the one manipulating the child. Judge Reese may not believe that domestic violence is a crime, but when a violent ex-husband takes the next incident too far, what will she then believe is a crime? It is a sad reality that such a biased judge such as Judge Mary Reese is able to take the bench. Howard County, Maryland has much to be concerned about with their presiding judges. Who will be liable when this man harms his ex-wife again, Judge Reese?