Hon. Yvette M. Bryant See Rating Details
Associate Judge
Circuit Court
Baltimore City County
8th Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   4.4 - 6 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   3.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

What others have said about Hon. Yvette M. Bryant



Comment #: MD4044
She is a very rude and disrespectful individual with a nasty disposition. She definitely is a poor example of positive and effective leadership. She believes that she is entitled because of the robe she wears which she uses to intimidate all in the courtroom. What she does represent is the epitome of everything that is wrong with Baltimore Family Court (Court System) in general. She does not make turning to the legal system any less daunting, even when you are the one looking for help and justice, which so many who have had the misfortune to go in front of her, are in fact seeking.


Comment #: MD3763
Immature, bias, can't make an informed decision! Personal opinion/feelings take preference over legality. Such an injustice to those who need protection. Very much, a total disappointment....

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD3647
Excellent judge.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD1668
She did improved. Still needs work, but I think somebody told her the score.

Civil Litigation - Govt.

Comment #: MD1188
This woman should not be on the bench. I have seen her tear pages out of the official court file and then say she does not see them in the court file. She has a clear bias. She will rule without evidence. I have seen her on several occasions either deny or grant a Motion within a day of the filing without allowing opposing counsel to reply or Answer before her ruling. She talks about cases and parties and counsel to the court staff including not only the clerks but the bailiff's and the clerks at the intake desk. She is mean spirited and will put defamatory remarks about the parties and the counsel in her rulings for public record. Finally, she regularly communicates ex parte with either a party or an attorney and will rule based on the ex parte communication. She should not be on the bench. That is my conclusion. She is a disgrace to the Court.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD1170
What a nasty person. She was nasty to everybody - attorneys, parties, pro se litigants. Worse case of "black robe disease" I have seen in 20 years of practice. Where did they find her?

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD1005
This was one of the worst judges I had ever worked with in 30 years of practice. She clearly favored opposing counsel. I generally work in another jurisdiction. She would interrupt and cut off both me and my client. Opposing counsel represented an alcoholic who wanted to increase custodial rights. They were granted on no evidence whatsoever. Her ruling was an hour along and full of personal bias against my client, whom she perceived as being mean-spirited. Worst yet, the alcoholic has since been involved in several incidents with minor children in the car.