Hon. John E. Nunn, III See Rating Details
Associate District Judge
Circuit Court
Kent County
2nd Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   6.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. John E. Nunn, III


Comments


Other

Comment #: MD2187
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
A very good friend had him for a protection order and he was very involved and understanding of the situation. The problem was that he didn't pay enough attention to the facts of the case, where the respondent lied numerous times in charging documents and relied only on the respondent's family member for a ruling. Now my friend will not get to see his kids because his ex-wife has an order on him. The legal system failed this time. Still, he is better then most judges.

Other

Comment #: MD1706
Rating:6.0
Comments:
He was unprepared, inattentive and almost totally dismissive of answers from defendants and attorneys. He had agreed in chambers to a productive rehab process and sentence and then totally ignored it in favor of a harsher, far more punative sentence in court. He is inconsistent and can not be relied upon to be fair.