Hon. Audrey A. Creighton See Rating Details
Associate District Judge
Circuit Court
Montgomery County
6th Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   3.9 - 17 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Audrey A. Creighton


Comments


Other

Comment #: MD3885
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
And you FUCKERS get your story straight....Monty Williams was NEVER my fiancé. He black and got five kids.....That's a Negative. I would NOT fuck Monty Williams if ''OBAMA'' ORDERED IT. My pussy tighter than Obama security to IRAQ. And I sure as fuck not going Behind Rick crack head ass sloppy seconds. Last person I fucked he still employed as a SENATOR. His dick was GOOD and so is CASH.

Other

Comment #: MD3884
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
And as far as that BS, I never slept with no damn Audrey Creighton. Audrey funds can't touch me. I sure as hell do not do Black/ Woman/ Spanish. Audrey falls in that category. Only one woman can get me in her bed and that's Oprah as soon as her $10 million dollar check clear. I do Oprah and her dogs. Audrey story is a -D- minus at most. Get a life. People. Stop sniffing Coke....OBAMA could not get me to fuck him on a order from Congress.

How about half you fucking lawyers and prosecutors stop SNIFFING COKE.....WIN A FUCKING CASE.

Shelley

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD3873
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge Creighton is that bitch. This you Peter you keep posting. Or is this her stalker Mccullin. Rick plead guilty case over. Fuck Rick FAGGIE ass. Only a FAGGIE put his hands on a woman. And what about all those coke sniffing lawyer! State attorneys! Prosecutors they stay buying coke and pills. Crocked ass mother fuckers judging Judge Creighton and they crack heads.

Prosecutor

Comment #: MD3870
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Here we have a judge who not only idolizes and rewards the criminal, but one who fornicates with teenager criminals 30 years her junior, and a judge who has become a criminal herself.
She deliberately lied to police about her relationship to fugitive Senning during their investigation, and only after it became obvious that her dishonesty was about to be exposed, and in order to obtain a protective order to give credibility to her accusations regarding Senning, did she then admit to the facts of her co-habitation. She apparently also lied to the Judicial Nominating Committee during questioning about her past as a public defender, when she engaged in predatory sexual relationship(s) with a client or clients which she purportedly represented. It appears she again lied before yet another nominating committee, this one for the Circuit Court position, about whether she had previously been investigated for ethics violations. She further not only harbored a repeat criminal, a felon with an extensive record, the evidence shows she knowingly aided and abetted him, and abused her position as a judge to do so. Also, according to a federal lawsuit filed against Creighton for civil rights obstructions of justice, she further aided and abetted an immigration lawyer who had been criminally charged with fabricating evidentiary material by deliberately falsifying an affidavit. Creighton further rewarded that criminal act, and in doing so was fully aware that she had suborned perjury, and even went on to engage in a cover-up. Creighton’s criminal complicity has been revealed on numerous occasions when she accepted as “fact’ what she obviously knew or reasonably should have known to be perjured testimony.
So here is a judge, criminal in her actions, who delights in the power she wields to pervert justice while hiding behind judicial robes, who time and again will rule in favor of her fellow criminal, while simultaneously placing the blame on the one who obeys the law, as if he is the wrongdoer, and will even threaten retaliation against those who complain.
The questions remain; Why has this judge not been charged criminally and brought to justice? Why is such a misfit judge still on the bench? Is this simply a local matter of one dirty hand washing another, or does a cover-up extend to higher places?

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD3869
Rating:1.0
Comments:
The recent Sentinel Newspaper article about Creighton raised some interesting questions as to why she would hire such a well-connected criminal defense attorney to represent her. After all, aren't Montgomery County sitting judges generally regarded as above the law?
Q: Why does this judge seek out and surround herself with all manner of criminals?
A: All the better to help her commit her crimes, such as the cyber criminals she has employed to hack into this site to delete the hundreds of negative comments which expose her for what she is.
Q: Why does this judge seek out and surround herself with crack-hoes and other assorted liars-for-hire, going all the way back to her days as a public pretender?
A: All the better to aid her in suborning perjury when she gets caught and needs all the help she can get covering up her crimes.

Prosecutor

Comment #: MD3868
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Audrey Creighton must resign. Anyone who exhibits the kind of unconscionable, predatory behavior that she has shown via her relationship with Rickly Senning is in desperate need of psychiatric care.

Indisputably, Judge Creighton does not possess good judgment; ergo, she should not be in a position of power where she is able to determine other peoples' fates. She must step down. Period.

No excuses. She lied on an official police report; she harbored a violent criminal; she failed to recuse herself and she engages in judicial retaliation against those Marylanders who dare call her out on her criminality.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD3867
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Why is everyone so surprised by Audrey Anne Creighton's behavior. I went to high school with her. She has always been a big, slut hoe. Her sisters Karen, Yvonne big hoes also. It runs in the family. It's in the blood. They're just very sneaky. Karen was always doing people man. Got caught in the bathroom one day giving blow job to this guy. She follows right behind her big sister Audrey. This is nothing new. I am surprised it took the legal system so long to expose her. This is not Audrey Anne's first time having sex with a client. Her sex with clients goes as far back as twenty years. I am so happy she was exposed. Audrey looks down on people. When she became a Judge, her family thought they had Arrived.

Audrey never had common sense. I will bet you any amount of money the charges are false that she filed on Rick. Whenever she get exposed she makes up big lies so people can feel sorry for her as a victim. She is a sneaky, devious, unscrupulous, habitual, pathological liar. Nothing she says is fusion. Judge Creighton reminds me of Judge Patrick Couwenberg.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD3860
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Heard she got some good, tight pussy. Soft and wet. Rick said you got good pussy. But crazy as a fox. Said you suck his dick when you was his public defender.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD3849
Rating:10.0
Comments:
I know you bitches better keep my name out this shit. No Judge Creighton did not ask me to lie for her. William I am going to curse you'r big fat ass out if you ever bring me in any fucking court room! I will count how many dicks it took your mother to swallow you out her.

Judical committe can suck a dick! Put a warrant on that. You fucking with a bitch that do not give a fuck. Supena your DNA to find out who your fat, fuck of a farther is. Quit fucking around before o put voodoo on your cheeseburger looking ass.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD3846
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
JUDICAL COMMITTE GET A FUCKING LIFE….PLUS SOME COCK. WILLIAM CALL JENNY CRAIG SHE GOT SPECIALS FOR FAT BITCHES LIKE YOU.

Other

Comment #: MD3761
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
It is amazing that these ridiculous posts continue. What would you losers do without Judge Creighton? You are completely obsessed, confused and down right stupid. Get a life!

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD3760
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Some judges choose justice. Some judges choose money. With Judge Creighton it is no contest. She will always choose the later when self-gratification and/or personal enrichment is an option. With this judge on the bench it is one miscarriage of justice after another.

Prosecutor

Comment #: MD3759
Rating:1.0
Comments:
For those who think that a judge need not adhere to judicial ethics, should not be held accountable for her actions and be given carte blanche to do whatever she wants to do, please pay attention.
From www.MyRealityLaw.org/blog --

The American Bar Association’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct prohibit a lawyer from having “sexual relations with a client unless a consensual sexual relationship existed between them when the client-lawyer relationship commenced”. Most states have adopted this rule or something analogous. Presumably, Creighton and Senning did not have a consensual relationship prior to his becoming her client. Senning was 19 at the time; the future judge was 48.

The first question to be addressed from this matter is: what the hell was Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley thinking when he appointed Creighton to the bench? This, in turn, involves the subsidiary question: What kind of vetting was done before Creighton was given the awesome responsibility to make decisions effecting the lives of litigants who come before her? It is difficult to believe that the Creighton/Senning affair was a total secret. Something like that is bound to get out and, once it’s out, it is way out. Everybody knows about it and soon. Was Creighton’s unprofessional conduct overlooked or ignored by those trusted with the responsibility of assuring the integrity of judicial appointments? Or, was the process so inadequate that this lapse of professional judgment was missed? Either way, it is an embarrassment to the judiciary.

If there is one quality folks want from their judges, it is judgment. Note the similar root word. This is not a linguistic accident. Commencing an intimate relationship with a burglar/thief three decades one’s junior does not speak well of one’s judgment. It is especially troubling for a judge.

Let us examine the potential ramifications of a judge having an intimate relationship with a criminal. First, there is the possibility of blackmail. The judge may, understandably, want to keep the affair quiet. So, she may be asked to do judicial favors as a quid pro quo. Then, there is the issue of conflict of interest. If the judge becomes aware of a secret grand jury investigation involving her lover or one of his associates, can the judge be trusted not to spill the beans and compromise the investigation? Also, if the criminal has access to a judge, the criminal has access to any court records the judge has in her possession. Some of those records are sealed with good reason. Lest someone thinks love conquers all, a judge/criminal romance is a very bad idea.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD3709
Rating:1.0
Comments:
A dishonest and shameless hypocrite who preaches rule of law, but does not practice rule of law. Not in her rulings, nor in her so-called private life.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD3660
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Not even a pretext of principled decision making. In a case which opposition insurance company lawyer refused to provide discovery or answer interrogatories, a motion to compel and/or for sanctions (which inexplicably had not been ruled upon for nearly a year) and a renewed motion in the interim, were filed. On the day of the trial Judge Creighton refused to provide any remedy whatsoever to the outstanding motions, or even to reschedule the trial date until after compliance with discovery, because "the matter's already set-in for trial." Her verdict (surprise, surprise) went on to reward the defendant's insurance company (their lawyer even joked during recess that the "fix was in") despite overwhelming photographic evidence and testimony which should have been a slam-dunk for the plaintiff.
As author Brian Khan recently pointed out, when not only politicians but judges are allowed to receive gifts in unlimited amounts, how can a litigant really expect any justice when he goes up against deep-pocketed corporations and insurance companies?
[Redacted by Ed.]

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD3606
Rating:1.0
Comments:
As those who practice in MoCo's Circuit Court by now well know, as well as those who risk arguing their case before her, Audrey Creighton not only has a history of bad decisions, but absurd and shameless decisions, both on and off the bench.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD3550
Rating:1.0
Comments:
As previously noted on this site, The Washington Post on 7/15/14 reported that Audrey Creighton is now under investigation by the Commission on Judicial Disabilities. What they did not report is that this is not the first time that she has been before the CJD on ethics charges. Not only did the Commission fail to do its job the last time around, the nominating committee failed miserably in its vetting process, and/or Creighton lied to them about her past.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD3536
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Not the brightest bulb on the bench. Far from it! In District Court, whenever a decision was required, she would announce a recess, as if to make a call from chambers to whoever was advising her. When returning to the bench, more often than not, still she couldn't get it right. How did she ever get to be a judge?

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD3434
Rating:9.3
Comments:
I had a trial with Judge Creighton and was very impressed with the way she handled the matter. She made appropriate inferences, listened to the witnesses, and was cognizant of the law. She took the matter under advisement for approximately 30 minutes, during which time she thoroughly reviewed the evidence and made an intelligent ruling.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD3412
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Creighton lacks even the most basic understanding of trial mechanics, she seems to lack an appreciation for the law, and she is overwhelmingly unimpressive as a jurist. She didn't belong on the District Court bench and certainly is unqualified to sit in the Circuit Court.

Other

Comment #: MD3328
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
The comments posted cannot be deleted by any Judge. Perhaps the reason the website is removing the comments is because the comments left are vulgar. The purpose of this website is for the people, law officials or lawyers to comment on a case that was held in front of a specific judge. Therefore, people can be aware how a judge proceeds in rulings or etc. This is not a forum to discuss the public life of any judge.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD3250
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge Creighton lacks even the most basic understanding of trial mechanics, she seems to lack an appreciation for the law, and she is overwhelmingly unimpressive as a jurist. She didn't belong on the District Court bench and certainly is unqualified to sit in the Circuit Court.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD2962
Rating:9.7
Comments:
Smart woman, good lawyer and good judge.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD2654
Rating:9.0
Comments:
Judge Creighton is a thoughtful, dignified and respectable member of the Circuit Court bench.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD2321
Rating:9.3
Comments:
Judge Creighton will likely exceed the expectations generated by her high levels of legal acumen and judicial management.

Perhaps the governor should be more consistent in his appointments.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD2315
Rating:8.4
Comments:
She is kind, very smart and caring. She is fair and understanding. Great judge. I heard she can sing too!