Hon. Pamila J. Brown See Rating Details
Associate District Judge
Circuit Court
Howard County
5th Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   4.0 - 4 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

What others have said about Hon. Pamila J. Brown


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD3966
Horribly rude. Insecure and inappropriate in her comments. I have almost walked away from the trial table because of her yelling. She is a do nothing judge and acts like litigants and attorneys inconvenience her by being on her docket.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD3071
Very considerate and thoughtful in her decisions, perfect for a District Court seat.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD1922
This judge litigated a he said/she said case with one independent witness. Claims and cross-claims. Numerous out-of-state witnesses. This judge was rude to the attorneys and litigants. At the end of this long case, she found that neither side met the burden of proof and ignored testimony of one independent witness. Avoid her at all costs.