Hon. David E. Carey See Rating Details
District Judge
Circuit Court
Harford County
3rd Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.8 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   10.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. David E. Carey


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: MD6619
Rating:10.0
Comments:
I was very pleased with the result. He saw thru the lies in testimony and ruled correctly...One of the few judges in Harford County that was not a former ASA and actually knows what he is doing.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD6393
Rating:1.8
Comments:
I just heard this judge give an oral decision from the bench that clearly laid out why the litigant was being attacked by his wife, but then ordered a protective order. I also heard him shut down and refuse to hear the respondent's argument about how there was no fear, but then allow the petitioner's appointed lawyer go on about fear. The case following this had two parties that started with opening comments that then devolved into testimony being given during the openings. I wish Harford County judges would just call balls and strikes and be knowledgeable on the law. That's why this jurisdiction is known as a legal backwater.