Hon. William V. Tucker See Rating Details
Associate Circuit Judge
Circuit Court
Howard County
5th Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.4 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

What others have said about Hon. William V. Tucker


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD6166
No backbone or thought of his own. He should fit in well with Howard County, since he goes along with what he is told to do. Evenhandedness? Try NoHandedness.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD5589
Forms opinions based upon his personal bias or initial impression toward people instead of hearing all of the evidence and making an informed decision. Suspicious of ex parte communications that are unethical in his making these illogical decisions that do not appear to be supported by the law or record. Doesn't appear to have a conscience and doesn't care about the law. Will issue ruling and take money from custodial parent to support children in cases to support his attorney friends, even if they are representing a very bad person and even if it is not supported by the law. Very sad commentary on our justice system.


Comment #: MD4576
what an arrogant Uncle Tom!! He does not review the facts of a case but just makes opinions based on his colleagues previous decisions. He is a disappointment!!