Hon. William V. Tucker See Rating Details
Associate Circuit Judge
Circuit Court
Howard County
5th Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.4 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 8 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. William V. Tucker


Comments


Other

Comment #: MD6786
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge told me that 2 wrongs make a right and told me that because i checked thw wrong box on the expungment form the state doesnt have to comply with the 30 day reply time requirement set in plave by themselves. You cannot deny my expungement according to the law but you did anyway, then u told me your reason was i filed the paper work incorrectly. It does not matter if i checked the wrong box, the states attorney had 30 days to reply and they took 31-33 depending on if u count the actual days filed. Tucker walked all over my rights because i was without a lawyer. Ill be back.

Other

Comment #: MD6712
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge is absolutely awful. He needs to be removed. This judge took a dying woman away from a loving husband because of an erroneous blemish in the husbands recvord. He refused to listen to the evidence presented and as a direct result a woman was placed into a facility where she was not properly cared for. This woman when she was able to asked daily to go home and could not due to this judge. She was robbed of her right to die in her home and her husband was robbed of the opportunity to care for his dying wife. This judge should be ashamed of himself and the state should remove him, he has no compassion and had no problem denying due process to a concerned husband !

Court Staff

Comment #: MD6618
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Tucker needs to get out and change career. He is the worse judge I ever seen. The worse is for the one who represent themselves and are woman. He has no respect whatsoever with woman gender. He judge before the final judgment. Even you bring facts he doesn't care and made his decision before the trial start.

Court Staff

Comment #: MD6617
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Tucker seems to not care about facts or evidence in civil matters, that he bases his rulings on his own opinion of people, or situation, that what the law states plays no role in his rulings.I believe he is dangerous to those who come before him. That fairness and the rule of law plays no role in his courtroom...Children are being sent to live with parents that are not in there best interest, non-custodial parents are at his mercy, not the rule of law even when there is clear evidence that the other party to the case lies and falsified records...He should be removed from the bench, as he has broken the laws many times over.

Other

Comment #: MD6470
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Lazy Judge and arrogant. If you have civil or criminal case with Judge Tucker his ruling doesn't following the MD Law. He making ruling on what he feels or the mood he in that is very dangerous especially when It some life or family.

Other

Comment #: MD6432
Rating:1.0
Comments:
this judge is not a judge he just being paid to do nothing and judge you before the trial start! He does not like women and do everything for men only! what a shame for Howard County. I just can't wait he goes away!!

Other

Comment #: MD6431
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This judge needs to get out!!! He judge before the judgment!

Litigant

Comment #: MD6368
Rating:1.0
Comments:
His rulings clearly break the law in my case He took away a wife of 47 years that is dying of cancer because I had a 30 year old felony' illegal as hell.

Litigant

Comment #: MD6336
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge uses the bench to further cause harm; abuse of power.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD6166
Rating:1.8
Comments:
No backbone or thought of his own. He should fit in well with Howard County, since he goes along with what he is told to do. Evenhandedness? Try NoHandedness.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD5589
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Forms opinions based upon his personal bias or initial impression toward people instead of hearing all of the evidence and making an informed decision. Suspicious of ex parte communications that are unethical in his making these illogical decisions that do not appear to be supported by the law or record. Doesn't appear to have a conscience and doesn't care about the law. Will issue ruling and take money from custodial parent to support children in cases to support his attorney friends, even if they are representing a very bad person and even if it is not supported by the law. Very sad commentary on our justice system.

Other

Comment #: MD4576
Rating:1.0
Comments:
what an arrogant Uncle Tom!! He does not review the facts of a case but just makes opinions based on his colleagues previous decisions. He is a disappointment!!