Hon. Sherrie L. Krauser See Rating Details
Associate Judge
Circuit Court
Prince George's County
7th Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   3.6 - 25 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   2.0 - 7 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Sherrie L. Krauser


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD1927
Rating:9.3
Comments:
#1920, say what you like about about Judge Krauser. She is one thing: she gets the law right. In fact, she almost never gets the law wrong. She is also very smart. Her courtroom decorum is not her best quality, but I would take her any day, (rude, but smart) over an ignoramus like Wallace. I do not believe she is power-hungry. She is an equal-opportunity offender.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD1920
Rating:4.3
Comments:
The commenters below nail her. She is a horse's ass, but a horse's ass to everyone. I hate to appear in front of her, but at the end of the day the secret is to bow to her greatness and you'll get a fair hearing.

Other

Comment #: MD1878
Rating:10.0
Comments:
I personally feel that this is an outstanding judge. Everyone comments tahat she is rude, disrespectful, and alot of other comments. However, I find these characters in her to be great. I have a child (mental health patient) that went in front of her and the State (DSS) tried to sugar coat the case. The judge was not trying to hear that and wanted to do what was best for my child. I like that she is stern and concerned about others and what the real picture is instead of what everyone wants to sugar coat. Thanks to this judge my child is in the process of getting what she needs to get her better. So nasty she may be.....but that is what makes her a GREAT JUDGE!!!!

Other

Comment #: MD1780
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She is totally disrespectful. How can any one keep allowing her to do waht she does, I just don't understand it. She is very prejudical and nasty to attorneys in front of others. Something really needs to be done about her.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD1677
Rating:1.8
Comments:
I have been practicing for some years and have been before a lot of judges, but have never been before Judge Krauser. She was the motion judge and the other side filed an emergency motion for an injunction. She failed to understand the facts, took the others lawyer's side who knew her and then issued an injunction without requiring a bond which is mandatory. i told her she had to require a bond to protect my clients and she told me to appeal the case and that would tie things up longer. I have never been treated with such disrespect and have a judge blatantly ignore the rules they are supposed to uphold.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD1580
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Just look at all the comments. Even the good comments reflect that she is harsh, bad judge, bad temperment, abusive, horrid, dictator, etc. etc. etc. Judges like her beg for cameras in the courtroom where their biases and incompetence can be shown to the public. And most unfortunately, she is up for re-election this year and since no one is challenging the sitting judges, she will automatically be put back on the bench. This is truly a shame. We can do better than her. She should withdraw her name and resign. The local newspapers fail to highlight the dysfunctional judiciary system in P.G. County -- and they overlook the bad judges like her. We need a recall election for her. I could not that a judge would be allowed to speak to court litigants in her court in such a disrespectful way. Several times she blatantly ridiculed people. I believe she is trying to become one of the TV type judges, that don't care about what they are ruling on just that they find themselves amusing. Or maybe she just has a narcissistic personality.
She would ask someone a question, then answer it herself. It is a shame that the court system is in such poor shape that they would allow Sherrie L. Krauser to serve on the bench

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD1567
Rating:6.1
Comments:
just treat her like god and she is alright.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD1564
Rating:5.0
Comments:
When you're before her pretend she is a dictator who has the ability to send you to a labor camp for the rest of your life. When she smells your fear - and tilt your head down a little so she feels powerful - she will spare you

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD1551
Rating:1.2
Comments:
Just look at all the comments. Even the good comments reflect that she is harsh, bad judge, bad temperment, abusive, horrid, dictator, etc. etc. etc. Judges like her beg for cameras in the courtroom where their biases and incompetence can be shown to the public. And most unfortunately, she is up for re-election this year and since no one is challenging the sitting judges, she will automatically be put back on the bench. This is truly a shame. We can do better than her. She should withdraw her name and resign. The local newspapers fail to highlight the dysfunctional judiciary system in P.G. County -- and they overlook the bad judges like her. We need a recall election for her.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD1470
Rating:8.6
Comments:
#1468, I have posted before. But I'll make this rebuttal on her behalf. Like you, I have won and lost before her. Like you, I have born the brunt of her fire. She is a very good judge, and a very smart one. She does sound harsh sometimes, but she does it to everyone. You mentioned that her husband is a judge, but you forgot to mention that her mother was also a judge. Frankly, I don't think that the vitriol towards her is well-deserved.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD1468
Rating:2.9
Comments:
Bad judge. Bad temperament. Abusive to litigants. Not smart. Not thoughtful. Not analytical. I've won cases with her, so this isn't sour grapes. She just plain shouldn't be a judge. She wasn't even a good lawyer. She's a judge because her husband was the leader of the Democratic party in Maryland and called in a favor. She had no other qualifications for judicial appointment. For that matter, neither did her husband, but he got himself appointed as an appellate judge. His appointment garnered some criticism at the time. He, on the other hand, is a much better judge. The fact that she and her husband are on the bench is shameful.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD1375
Rating:1.0
Comments:
One of the single most horrid displays by a Judge in my entire legal career.

Other

Comment #: MD1345
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Needs to step down. I feel sorry for her husband Pete Krauser. To have to live with and put up with an asshole like her has to be totally unbearable, im suprised he's hasn't left her for a bottle of wine.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD1311
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I found this idiot (lack of better term)to be very rude, incompetent and to have total disregard for the law. Its almost as if she wants you to appeal her bird brain decessions/rulings.. I had the awful experience of seeing her incompetence first hand. She's the reason why neptotism should not be allowed in the judicial system.

Other

Comment #: MD1141
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
She has a very negative tone and looks down upon on minorities. She is unfit to be a judge in everyway.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD1138
Rating:9.4
Comments:
Intelligent, hardworking judge, who did a good job managing a complicated civil case. Can't speak to her demeanor in criminal cases, where people seem to have negative things to say.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD1133
Rating:6.5
Comments:
She's not a bad judge. Stop it! She's a dictator like a lot of judges are. Speaking as someone who has been roughed up by her quite often because I have represented a lot of scumbags, I will tell you this. She is smart, competent and able. Is she no-nonsense? Absolutely.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD1107
Rating:7.0
Comments:
I disagree that she is a bad judge. Her problem is that she is a tyrant. She will rough you up, but she is an equal-opportunity offender. She might come across as a jerk, but she knows the law. In fact, she might be the most competent judge I have ever come across.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD1101
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I am dumb founded how this woman got on the bench. Her hubby - the chief in the ct of special appeals - way brighter. Not intended to say much there either though. The Mrs. has been menopausal to long - she is disable. She needs to step down.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD1091
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Where's the 0 option? 1 is unreasonably high. Today she berated a witness because he still lives at home with his parents. I move to strike at least one of the "fair and reasonable" posts [within 12 minutes of each other on 3/24/2010]

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD1068
Rating:2.5
Comments:
Lazy and mean. A very bad combination for a judge.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD1059
Rating:1.0
Comments:
THIS IS THE WORST JUDGE I HAVE EVER MET. SHE UNDERMINES JUSTICE.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD886
Rating:2.3
Comments:
Abusive like her mother was when she was a judge. Go figure how Sherrie got on the bench.

Other

Comment #: MD871
Rating:1.0
Comments:
In my opinion, Judge Krauser is the worst judge ever to sit in any court of law in Maryland, second only to Judge Nalley in Charles County. In my opinion she is rude, abusive to lawyers and litigants and utterly lacking in judicial temperament. She should be asked to resign.

Litigant

Comment #: MD714
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I could not that a judge would be allowed to speak to court litigants in her court in such a disrespectful way. Several times she blatantly ridiculed people. I believe she is trying to become one of the TV type judges, that don't care about what they are ruling on just that they find themselves amusing. Or maybe she just has a narcissistic personality.
She would ask someone a question, then answer it herself. It is a shame that the court system is in such poor shape that they would allow Sherrie L. Krauser to serve on the bench.

Other

Comment #: MD713
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Unable to make judgments with in boundaries of the law, treats Litigant like trash.
that they is beneath her & does not wish to hear any thing they have to say even though her
ruling out come could be life threatening to a child

Litigant

Comment #: MD710
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
It is insulting to everyone to have a judge like this on the bench. To not allow a litigant to speak or reply to a question, to humiliate them without knowing the full story, to dismiss them like they are not important. If someone requests an emergency hearing they should be heard and treated with respect! How is she still on the bench?

Litigant

Comment #: MD708
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge is highly inappropriate in her demeanor from the bench. She is dismissive and insulting to litigants before her. How she remains on the bench is beyond me.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD641
Rating:5.0
Comments:
I have always found her to be fair and reasnable

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD640
Rating:5.0
Comments:
I have always found her to be fair and reasnable

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD474
Rating:1.1
Comments:
Very rude and discourteous. Poor temperament.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD456
Rating:2.1
Comments:
I echo the other two posters on this site. She is arrogant, shoots from the hip and won't let you argue and ,in general, has a poor judicial temperament.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD375
Rating:1.1
Comments:
This Judge runs her court like a kangaroo court without any regard for the law. I do not know how she became a judge.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD3
Rating:1.7
Comments:
Shoots from the hip and is unwilling to listen to facts (or more than a one sentence argument). This judge is short-tempered and makes wildly inappropriate rulings. She seems to be afraid to decide some things - but on the other hand she has no sense of the limits to her authority.