Hon. Cathy Hollenberg Serrette See Rating Details
Associate Circuit Judge
Circuit Court
Prince George's County
7th Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   5.3 - 7 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Cathy Hollenberg Serrette


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD2203
Rating:1.6
Comments:
Wow, I thought that I was the only litigant who felt like this judge ruled on emotion rather than the law. Judges are sworn to be neutral on the bench -- that does not apply to her.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD1953
Rating:4.8
Comments:
Knows far less law and family law than she thinks she does. Seems to ignore facts frequently and rules from her emotions. Patronizing to attorneys and to the public, but thinks she is being protective of them. Believes that the courts are "the guardians of the people." (She actually said that). Gee, I thought that the courts were the guardians of the Law and the Constitution...

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD1741
Rating:6.9
Comments:
In front of her on family law matters frequently. She rules from emotions. She doesn't always listen. She delves into matters not pertinent nor relevant to the issues at hand. Like her a lot but not as a judge.

Other

Comment #: MD1608
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Does not take the law or standards into considerations.makes rulings based on emotion
. Doesn't even come close to being unbiased. Has a very hard time admitting when she has made an error. Desperatly wants to save face. Should of picked a different profession.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD867
Rating:4.8
Comments:
Since she has become head of the family division, she seemingly only takes the court schedule into account when ruling on some matters -- not the law or facts. This is unfortunate. She could be a good judge.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD298
Rating:3.9
Comments:
Does not listen to the facts. Rules from the hip. Forgets where she came from. If she lost to you when she was practicing, she takes it out on your client when back in front of her.