"The Robing Room: MA State Judges

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Beverly J. Cannone

Comments

Other

Comment #: MA1156
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Unlawful, unconstitutional, biased,

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MA1155
Rating:1.4

Comments:
This Judge is purposely trying to not give Karen Read a fair trial. There are hundreds of examples. SHe should've recused herself from the Karen Read trial 2 years ago because of her connections to the witnesses, some of which were the ones that murdered her or involved in the coverup.

Litigant

Comment #: MA1154
Rating:1.0

Comments:
I've been following the Karen Read case now for 2 years and I am absolutely appalled that this judge can be so blatantly biased and corrupt and still be allowed to be the judge for this 2nd trial. She should've recused herself from the case because of her connections to the prosecution witnesses and how much she's trying to protect them, the DA (whom also grew up in Quincy), the state police, etc. She is blatantly trying to ensure that Karen Read doesnt get a fair trial. At this point she's not even hiding the fact that she's biased and has connections to the the people that either were involved in his murder or involved in the coverup. Every single hearing and every day of trial there are dozens of examples of her corruption. Just yesterday April 30th, during Jen McCabe's testimony, she did everyhing to help her. She blatantly tried to stop the defense from know that Jen McCabe lied to the FBI. The appropriate questions the defense had for McCabe that the CW attorney would object to, Judge Cannone would sustain almost every time. These questions werent hearsay. They were focused on McCabe's state of mind in the moment and the reasons behind why she behaved in a specific moment. No normal judge would sustain most of the objected to questions that were asked. Her behavior is extremely disturbing and scary and it makes many residents of MA feel like we are living in a 3rd world country. Judge Cannone should be fired, disbarred and put in jail for her corrupt behavior.

Other

Comment #: MA1152
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This is by far the worst judge I've ever seen. The bias is IN YOUR FACE against the defense. She is nasty shippy when she has no choice but to side with the defense, and is clearly stomping all over the constitution of the USA, as a matter of fact, in her courtroom the constitution does not even exist. There are clear Brady violations, and she treats/allows others to treat EXPERT witnesses like they're idiots, while allowing the CW to bring witnesses with no credibility. She is allowing the CW to waste tax payers money, and showing the world that its in their best Interest to never visit the state of Mass. It's sickening to watch the lengths at which this judge will allow the CW to do for a win at any cost. . There should be enough bad reviews to get someone to really LOOK AT WHAT IS HAPPENING. She needs to be removed from the bench!

Other

Comment #: MA1151
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Beverly needs to be reminded that the WORLD, and the FEDS are watching.
She has sat on that bench and made false representations saying she treats the prosecution and defense equally. Her "grave concerns" tell us otherwise.
On multiple occasions, she has warned the defense about "theatrics" and "hyperbole" outside of the presence of the jury, but today 4/28/25 she let the "prosecutor" run her courtroom, disrespect witnesses, and even cut her off to continue berating an expert witness.
She says the defense is hiding evidence (which they ARE NOT) but not one word about the constitutional violations from the prosecution like videos being turned over 3 years later that was a CLEAR CUT BRADY VIOLATION.
Beverlys behavior gives the community at large grave concerns, and she should be first up on the federal investigation list.
This sham of a trial should have NEVER made it this far.
THIS IS NOT HOW OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM IS SUPPOSED TO WORK.
Where there is even a hint of impartiality, to preserve the public trust in our court system, a judge must recuse themselves.
We are far beyond a hint. She has multiple personal connections to witnesses, that alone is enough for recusal. She is now so pro prosecution that she is coaching witnesses "can you answer that", and helping the prosecutor when she actually sustains a defense objection she tells the prosecutor the grounds. She most certainly does not give that same courtesy to the defense.

Her actions in this case have been disgraceful to say the least, and the editors of this website clearly know that seeing as how almost every single review from 2024 has been removed.

I can't say it enough...THIS IS NOT HOW OUR COURT SYSTEM IS SUPPOSED TO WORK.

If the citizens can no longer trust our legal system, what does that do to our community? It dismantles it.

Beverly Cannone is giving every other respectable judge in Norfolk County a bad name, and hopefully they will hold her to account because at this point it she is behaving like she is above the law.

THE WORLD AND THE FEDS ARE WATCHING YOU BEVERLY.

Other

Comment #: MA1150
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I used to work in law. I went to court and watched many judges preside over cases. This is honestly the first time (besides Judge Ito) [Redacted by Ed] She is so biased that she can’t even FAKE being fair. It’s so clear in the Karen Reed trial that all of the prosecution witnesses are lying through their teeth. The judge sustains every single objection and even prompts the prosecutor to object even before he gets it out of his mouth. She plays for the prosecution team by not allowing obvious evidence to be thoroughly examined and questioned. After the very first defense witnesses are lying, she told the defense to wrap it up!! Are you kidding me? How does anyone with morals do that? She has zero morals and will do anything to help the prosecution. This makes me very sad and untrusting with our judicial system. I used to think that the law was upheld and that the system was fair and balanced. This crazy person has ruined the reputation of the judicial system. She’s crabby, mean and short with the defense yet she talks to the prosecution like they are babies who need a diaper change. I’m outraged at this trial. Karen Reed is being set up, not only by the witnesses who are clearly lying under oath, but the JUDGE too! It’s awful to watch. Look out if this judge seats the jury to find Karen guilty. There will be protests all over the country. SHAME ON WHOEVER IS ALLOWING THIS WONAN TO SIT ON THAT BENCH!

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MA1149
Rating:1.0

Comments:
This judge seems to really not want to be where she is. And I for one wish she’d be thrown off the case.
She huffs and puffs and it’s obvious to the courtroom and people watching, the last place she wishes to be is this courtroom.
She gets EASILY frustrated by the smallest of things and most everyone picks up on that. Especially when dealing with the defense, never does she show this behavior when dealing with the C.W.
She never runs her courtroom on time, she’s always behind and then leaves by 4:00 pm if not before that

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MA1146
Rating:1.1

Comments:
This judge is so one-sided, inconsiderate and rude. She should not be on the bench! She is a nightmare bad for business in the state of Massachusetts. She refuses to call out inconsistency / lies in testimony and stops defense at any point where they're making headway. She has a side in this fight and she's made it pretty obvious.

Other

Comment #: MA1143
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Day 1 of the Karen Read trial: Cannone tells the defense to wrap it up on the first witness!
Day 2: Cannone telling the defense, we are not playing the video again!
I could literally go on and on about how disgusted, mortified, and embarrassed I am to admit I'm from Massachusetts. The judicial system is shot due to judges like Cannone. She could care less that her biases show everytime the defense is trying to defend Karen Read. The appellate issues from this trial (#2) are pages. How can a judge get away with completely disregarding the Constitution? Karen Read is getting very, very far from a fair trial. Any attorney or judge who looks into Cannone's actions will be appalled to say the least. Cannone needs to be investigated and she needs to be held accountable for violating the Constitutional rights of Karen Read and making a mockery out of the MA judicial system. She is doing everything she can to ensure Karen does not get a fair and unbiased trial. Cannone does not care, and rules and regulations do not apply to the prosecution, and that should scare all Norfolk County citizens.

Other

Comment #: MA1139
Rating:1.0

Comments:
As someone who's followed the Karen Read trial from day one, I have to say — the most disturbing part hasn’t just been the prosecution’s wild and speculative narrative, it has been Judge Beverly Cannone’s absolute failure to ensure fairness in her courtroom.

Here are some key reasons why I believe she’s compromised the integrity of the entire first trial, second trial pre trial and which looks set to be amped up even as of day 1 in this second trial!

1. Biased Rulings Against the Defense
She barred the defense from naming third-party suspects despite them presenting motive, opportunity, and digital evidence. This wasn’t a legal technicality — it was a tactical silencing of a valid defense strategy.

2. Objection Handling Is a Joke
The prosecution can lead witnesses, speculate, and get dramatic with no pushback. The defense? Constantly shut down. Sustained. Sidebar. Overruled. It’s like watching a rigged game play out in real time.

3. Protecting Prosecution Witnesses from Accountability
Jennifer McCabe introduced the “I hit him” quote for the first time at trial. Not in interviews, not in grand jury — nowhere else. And no audio or video picked it up. Any judge worth their robe would have questioned that. Cannone didn’t flinch.

4. Disregard for Evidentiary Chain of Custody
Dog DNA, key phone records, deleted calls — all handled with the care of a soap opera script. Yet Cannone hasn’t shown any urgency about that mishandling. She lets the prosecution hide behind half-measures while demanding exacting detail from the defense..

5. Attempting to Push Out ARCCA, a Highly Qualified Defense Expert
The defense hired ARCCA — one of the most reputable digital forensic firms in the country. Instead of respecting their credentials and independence, Cannone has consistently tried to undercut or limit their testimony, even while the prosecution withheld metadata crucial to their analysis. You can’t demand perfect science from one side and let the other hoard evidence like it’s classified.

6. No Pressure on the Commonwealth to Comply with Discovery
Let’s be clear: The prosecution failed to turn over metadata — a basic requirement in a digital evidence case. This isn’t a minor oversight. It prevents the defense from conducting a full forensic analysis. Cannone’s response? Silence. No sanctions. No pressure. Just business as usual. This is also just an example, there are many more ridiculous examples.

7. The Optics Don’t Lie
Sidebars heavily favor the Commonwealth. Her tone changes depending on who’s speaking. It’s clear she’s more referee for the prosecution than neutral judge.

Bottom line, this isn’t what justice looks like. Cannone hasn’t just made questionable calls — she’s allowed a trial with serious forensic and testimonial inconsistencies to proceed while handcuffing the defense. It’s more damage control than due process, and it’s undermined the entire system.

Other

Comment #: MA1138
Rating:1.0

Comments:
I am appalled and disgusted by Cannone’s blatant disregard for “interest of justice”. As the Bible says; You will know them by their fruit. Cannone has shown over and over again her biases towards the defense, with her unethical behavior when addressing the defense’s motions and rebuttals despite the factual evidence they provide to her. Her hypocrisy is astounding when you compare her rulings towards the CW vs the defense. If Cannone represents the judicial system in MA; everyone should be terrified of living there much less being a tourist. No one could expect to get a fair trial in MA, with a judge like Cannone making a total mockery of our judicial system.

Other

Comment #: MA1137
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Day1 of karen Read Trial
first witness cross examination:
Can we wrap this up?
We're not going to show the video again.

if that is not trying to tell the jury the Defense is wasting time i don't know what is

Other

Comment #: MA1136
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
FREE KAREN READ JUDGE CANNONE AND GIVE HER THE LIFE BACK SHE DESERVES. JUST REMEMBER ALL THE TAX PAYERS OF CANTON ARE PAYING FOR YOUR BIAS, INCOMPETENT KNOWLEDGE OF THE CONTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. IT'S A SHAME WHAT YOU HAVE DONE AND CONTINUE TO DO. PROTECT YOUR COMMUNITY FROM THE CORRUPT ALBERTS AND THE POLICE. THE EVIDENCE FREES KAREN AS LONG AS YOU CAN GET THE INSTRUCTIONS RIGHT FOR THE JURORS AT THE END. NOT GUILTY TO ALL 3 COUNTS. DOUBLE JEOPARDY.

Other

Comment #: MA1135
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I have never seen a Judge who sides with the commonwealth. Judge Beverly cannone has poor integrity . This judge has cut off the defense team several times. She has not done this to the commonwealth of Massachusetts, during the Karen read trial. The last trial , judge cannone made it difficult for jurors to understand jury instructions. She appeared irritated within the courtroom. This judge appears indifferent, has clearly shown her lack of respect for the jurors. I may be jaded, but the tension in her courtroom is palpable.
Thank you Julie K Moskowitz BSN MSN FNP

Other

Comment #: MA1134
Rating:1.0

Comments:
` Is no justice left in the US? Look at what a monster presides over the KR case. She refuses to allow KR a fair trial by ensuring the Defense cannot defend her! Will someone IMPEACH this wicked judge!? Karen is being prosecuted by the judge and Brennan. Obviously, Bev Cannone is mentally ill to be outright denying Karen any defense by blocking all the evidence and truth that she has to show the jury. IMPEACH!!

Other

Comment #: MA1133
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I’ve seen 3 cases this Judge has presided over. I can’t believe she will let her fairness and legal judgement go to corruption and allow Brady violation after Brady. Clearly helping Prosecutors and clearly has to check with someone prior to any ruling on this 1 case going into a second trial.
It’s sad to see this 1600’s Salem type trial on one woman all to hide and protect a group of connected people.
Very sad to see her legacy go down the toilet.
Very sad she let them corrupt her integrity.
Very sad to see someone either forced or complacent in her judgements on a high profile trial.

Other

Comment #: MA1132
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Bev. Cannone should have recused herself due to her summer rental and connection to the family in this case. She is a disappointment to our legal system. Lies, bias, favoritism, and violates our constitution. She should be removed or investigated. Shame, shame, shame on Massachusettes. Whats done in the dark, comes to light.

Other

Comment #: MA1131
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Given she was in the mental health committee, one would think she takes care of herself but doesn’t seem like she does-the very frequent almost constant sighs, interrupting, irritability, lack ofemotion regulation, weak perception and problem solving skills are all symptom of anxiety and depression. Her prosecution favoring rulings also suggest either some unresolved issues related to her prosecution dad and/or inability to stand up for th defense but instead let the prosecutor walk over her and guide the process. Come on Bev. Be a strong woman and don’t let drama-queen men throw you off your game. Use your intuition to see and call the lid and deceit in your courtroom. Young Beverleys need you to pave the way for them. Stand up fr the truth. You got this. Do what is right and true.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MA1129
Rating:1.3

Comments:
When a judge requires every defense expert witness to be subject to voir dire yet approves all the states witnesses without any voir dire is indication of an issue. To hold the defense to a higher standard and expectation in regards to discovery, candor, and filings while allowing the state to continually not turn over discover, not file supporting motions, and make bold face lies in open court is unacceptable and demonstrates why she should be removed from the bench. The bias is very very evident between courtroom demeanor, expectations, and her decisions themselves along with the commentary within those decisions.
MA needs judicial reform in regards to judges and their lack of accountability and oversight.

Other

Comment #: MA1126
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
An embarrassment to the state of Massachusetts. I have no prejudice either way in this trial. But this defendant is NOT getting a fair trial the judge openly supports the prosecution

Other

Comment #: MA1125
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This is my second review on this judge. Apparently, my initial one was taken down because it was unfavorable. It was neither threatening nor untrue. What is the point of this site if not to bring transparancy to the goings-on in her courtroom? This judge continues to violate the Constitution and case-law. The Prosecution's motions are rubberstamped, without question or voir dire, while the Defense is taken to task, repeatedly. The Defense is held to tight and unreasonable timelines, while the Prosecution can be late, or not have to provide written documentation to supplement his motions. This judge's obvious bias is highlighted by her "scolding" the Defense in view of jurors/potential jurors. Yet, the Prosecution lies numerous times (including showing an inverted video in court) without incident. It is validating to hear well-respected lawyers like Mark Bederow, Carl Steinberg, Melanie Little, Peter Tragos, Emily D. Baker, Brother Counsel, Larry Forman, Nan Gallagher, etc... have similar concerns. No matter what Beverly Cannone has done pre-Karen Read trial, or what she does thereafter, her legacy will be THIS.

Other

Comment #: MA1124
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Horrendous and terribly biased. Disdain for any and all defense attorneys ensures no one really gets a fair trial in her court room. Her decisions are not even-handed and she doesn’t even make attempt to hide such obvious bias.

Other

Comment #: MA1123
Rating:1.0

Comments:
I've written two reviews on this judge. Both have been taken down. I've written two positive reviews on two other judges. Both have remained on the site. Neither time have I written anything improper. This judge is clearly biased. It's so obvious that anyone being honest must admit it. I do not see how Karen Read can get a fair trial. There was no denying her bias after the dog behavior specialist was given an immediate "yes" and the medical doctor was a "close yes". Really? I'm also curious how her total rating adds up to be as high as it is. Seems she has friends everywhere.

Other

Comment #: MA1121
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Watched the Karen Read "case" on YouTube. In that case, the prosecution presented a video where left and right were reversed. They did not mention that fact on direct examination. The video had a timestamp that was not inverted. It is difficult to understand how an honest prosecution could have done that. Canone took no action against them!

To this day, we do not know how the video came to have left and right reversed, with a non-reversed time stamp. The judge ought to demand that information from the prosecution. Canone has not.

This is just one example among many.

Other

Comment #: MA1120
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Judge Cannone does not seem concerned that people all across the state are losing faith in the criminal justice system as a result of her turning a blind eye to the malfeasance that’s occurred within the MA State Police, Canton Police Department, and Norfolk DA’s Office. The fact she has not dismissed charges against Karen Read is both frightening and disheartening. Blatant malfeasance has become the norm.

Other

Comment #: MA1119
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Judge Cannone does not appear to care about the appearance of impropriety. The flagrant impropriety has become tangible and the state of Massachusetts should be ashamed. This cannot be tolerated. It is an affront to our constitution to permit this unchecked behavior.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MA1118
Rating:1.0

Comments:
I am writing to express my concerns regarding your recent editorial note about comment moderation on The Robing Room. While I understand the need to prevent libelous or threatening content, your approach to moderation appears to disproportionately censor public criticism of judges, limiting open and meaningful discourse.

Your policy prohibits commenters from using terms like "corrupt," "on the take," or "criminal" when describing judges, yet these terms may accurately reflect observed misconduct. If multiple users independently report similar concerns, dismissing them as “duplicative” only serves to shield judges from accountability rather than providing an open forum for discussion. Furthermore, your willingness to accept praise while imposing strict limitations on criticism creates an inherent bias in favor of judges, undermining the credibility of your platform as a place for honest judicial evaluations.

Additionally, equating strong criticism with "threatening" language is troubling. While true threats are unacceptable, legitimate concerns about judicial misconduct should not be silenced under the guise of protecting judicial integrity. The judiciary, like any public institution, must be subject to scrutiny. The suggestion that dissatisfied users should "go to Facebook" instead of expressing concerns on your platform further reinforces the perception that The Robing Room is selectively curating its content rather than fostering genuine transparency.

Moreover, your restriction on repeated comments fails to account for users who have observed a judge's behavior in multiple cases. If a user follows different hearings and trials conducted by the same judge, they should have the right to leave multiple reviews based on distinct observations. Judicial performance is not static, and ongoing patterns of behavior—whether positive or negative—deserve to be documented. Silencing users who provide continued insight into a judge’s conduct undermines the very purpose of this platform.

I urge you to reconsider these policies and implement a fairer, more consistent moderation approach that truly allows for public accountability of the judiciary. If The Robing Room aims to be a trusted resource for judicial reviews, it must uphold the principles of free and open discussion rather than suppressing valid criticism.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MA1116
Rating:1.0

Comments:
I agree with all the comments that have come before mine. I have NO respect for the way Judge Cannone is handling Karen Read’s case. She is everything that’s wrong with our judicial system.
She can still make this right by putting a stop to this sham of a case.

Other

Comment #: MA1115
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I am a member of numerous Facebook groups following the Karen Read trial, and I have seen firsthand the overwhelming public outcry against Judge Beverly Cannone’s blatant misconduct. Hundreds of group members have reported that their reviews on The Robing Room have been deleted, which is unacceptable. Censorship of public criticism against a judge accused of serious ethical violations should not be happening. I demand that this review stays up.

Judge Cannone’s handling of the Karen Read case has been riddled with judicial bias and misconduct:

Obstructing the Defense: She has consistently ruled against the defense on key motions while allowing the prosecution to push forward with a deeply flawed case.

Protecting Law Enforcement Misconduct: She has ignored clear conflicts of interest and credibility issues with law enforcement witnesses, instead siding with the prosecution at every turn.

Suppressing Exculpatory Evidence: Instead of ensuring a fair trial, she has allowed critical evidence to be hidden or delayed.

Violating Judicial Ethics (Canons 1 & 2 – Integrity & Impartiality): Her courtroom behavior has shattered public trust in an already fragile legal system.

The people have a right to speak out against judges who fail to uphold justice. Silencing criticism through censorship only further proves that the system is protecting itself at the expense of truth. This review must remain posted—transparency and accountability in our judiciary depend on it.

Court Staff

Comment #: MA1112
Rating:1.0

Comments:
This is my second attempt at leaving a review. I read the editor’s note and take issue with the level of censorship being applied. My original review did not contain anything that falls under the stated reasons for removal. I am simply sharing my honest perspective and expect transparency in the review process. Please ensure that this review remains visible.

As a courthouse clerk in another court, I have had the opportunity to observe various judges and their approach to justice. Unfortunately, Judge Beverly Cannone’s handling of cases raises serious concerns about fairness, transparency, and judicial temperament. Her courtroom decisions often appear inconsistent. Additionally, procedural issues, delays, and apparent bias in certain rulings have eroded public confidence in her ability to ensure impartial justice. A judge’s role is to uphold the law without favoritism, yet repeated complaints suggest a pattern of conduct that undermines public trust in the judicial system.

Other

Comment #: MA1110
Rating:1.0

Comments:
This judge bears singular responsibilty for the length of the first trial--short days, no days, etc. And it continues with her treatment of the defense and their ability to mount a defense. Just like Proctor wished Karen Read would commit suicide, Judge is running her into bankruptcy. She also is so obvious in her bias, her sighs and her attitude toward defense that there IS a hidden agenda. She is protecting herself under the guise of protecting the prosecution and trying to hand them a win. Despicable

Other

Comment #: MA1108
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
EDITOR'S NOTE:

We are the editors of therobingroom.com. The site is intended for members of the bar and the public to provide honest commentary, critique, or praise of judges. While we do not act as gatekeepers, preselecting the comments for publication, at the same time, we periodically review comments and remove them when inappropriate or potentially libelous.

Examples of inappropriate commentary include calling a judge corrupt, on the take, drunk or a criminal. The same poster flaming the judge with the identical criticism, minute after minute and day after day is also inappropriate as these comments are duplicative and not useful to users of the site. It may feel good for the poster but there's always Facebook or some other medium for that.

Of course, divulging personal non-public information about a judge, their family or where they live is inappropriate and thus not permitted on this website. So too, threatening a judge is wildly appropriate commentary. Libelous, offense and threatening commentary is discourteous, offensive and perhaps unlawful.

We welcome the posting of real critical commentary supported by something more than mere animus at being on the losing end of the judge's rulings and we hope those who use this site continue to benefit from its organically-created content.
Enjoy!
The Editor

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MA1098
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Judge Beverly Cannone’s handling of the Karen Read trial continues to raise serious concerns about fairness and judicial integrity. Her courtroom decisions consistently favor the prosecution, creating a one-sided trial that undermines the very concept of due process. From the outset, Cannone has demonstrated a troubling pattern of suppressing defense arguments, disregarding key evidence, and allowing blatant misconduct by the prosecution to go unchecked.

One of the most alarming aspects of Cannone’s conduct is her refusal to allow critical exculpatory evidence that contradicts the state’s narrative. She has actively blocked expert testimony and crucial witness statements that could exonerate Read, while permitting the prosecution to present speculative and questionable evidence. This selective gatekeeping suggests an agenda rather than an impartial application of the law.

Her bias extends beyond rulings; it is evident in her demeanor and control of the courtroom. She frequently interrupts Read’s defense team, cutting off their arguments and diminishing their ability to challenge the prosecution’s case. Meanwhile, she grants the prosecution wide latitude, allowing them to make misleading claims and objections without scrutiny. The double standard is impossible to ignore.

Furthermore, Cannone has allowed law enforcement figures involved in the case to escape scrutiny, even in the face of clear evidence of investigative corruption. Rather than ensuring a fair trial, she appears to be protecting those with institutional power, at the expense of a defendant facing life-altering consequences.

The Karen Read trial should have been about uncovering the truth, but under Cannone’s oversight, it has become a mockery of justice. Her actions erode public trust in the legal system and demonstrate why judicial oversight is desperately needed. A judge who cannot uphold the principles of impartiality and fairness has no place on the bench.

Other

Comment #: MA1092
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Biased. Can’t take a single iota of criticism. Frightening, truly frightening for all the people of Canton.

Other

Comment #: MA1091
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
DO NOT DELETED MY OPINION OF JUDGE BEVERLY CANNONE AS THIS IS A PUBLIC FORM FOR THE PUBLIC TO VOICE THEIR OPINION OF A JUDGE,IF YOU OR THE NAMED JUDGE DOESN'T LIKE THE PUBLICS OPINION OF THEM THEN THEY SHOULD CONSIDER STEPPING DOWN OR CHANGE THEIR BEHAVIOR
We are now into picking the jury in the Karen Read trail and Judge Cannone stated with lying to the potential jurors.
Her instruction to the potential jury was,There are people advocating for oneside or the other without seeing any evidence,that's a down right lie, There has already been one trial so the people that are advocating for oneside or the other have already seen the evidence in the first trial.Plus she is really showing her biased again Karen's lawyer in this second trial.

Other

Comment #: MA1090
Rating:1.0

Comments:
This judge appears to be very biased. I often wonder how she was at one time defended cases. She seems to constantly put her thumb on the scale, its almost as if she really doesnt beleive that a person is actually innocent until and unless proven guilty.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MA1084
Rating:9.1

Comments:
Excellent judge, generally. If anything, she favors the defense. But great temperament .

Other

Comment #: MA1081
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Worst Bias I have ever witnessed in a judge. She needs to be held accountable for obvious inconsistencies in her rulings. She heavily favors the prosecution and makes it nearly impossible for the defense to get a free trial.

Other

Comment #: MA1071
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Absolutely disgusted by this "judge"
And how this is so blatantly done WITH THE WORLD WATCHING. I don't even know what to say at this point. Karen Read has Absolutely no chance at a fair ANYTHING with this judge/prosecution

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MA1044
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Stop deleting these factual reviews.If Judge Beverly Cannone wishes to have good reviews, she should be ethical.

Litigant

Comment #: MA1033
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Extremely pro-prosecution with a blatant disregard for fairness or defendants rights. If she has an agenda, Constitutional rights be damned.

Other

Comment #: MA1022
Rating:3.0

Comments:
Disrespectful, biased , only nice to prosecutors, the prosecutor is lying right to her face and she turns her cheek. Sighs. Won’t let defense lawyers have extra time. Inconsistent rulings , CW vs Read her ruling on Her grave concerns was totally BS Brennan lied to her not Jackson team! Should have dismissed. The Inverted video should have been a grave concern and she looked the other way! Should have recused herself. Shame the on her, she was a defense attorney. And now kissing Morriseys butt! Corruption in Norfolk County is on display , she should retire

Other

Comment #: MA1021
Rating:3.0

Comments:
Cannone's behavior exhibits a similar pattern to that of Judge Maria Lopez. Disrespect for defendant(s), families, jurors, attorneys, general public. Placed herself on the CW vs. Read case though has generational ties to the family of DA Michael Morrissey (both of Quincy, family members worked together). Has single handedly significantly reduced confidence in the justice system in Massachusetts. States she had "grave concerns" and dismissed court against Defense attorneys when Prosecutor made unvetted, untrue statements about their practices.
https://massbar.org/publications/lawyers-journal/lawyers-journal-article/lawyers-journal-2003-july/after-lopez-

Other

Comment #: MA1020
Rating:1.0

Comments:
I work in the oncology field at Good Samaritan Hospital in NY. I’ve always been interested in watching court cases, I have watched many over the years. Well, I am not an attorney. The outright bias of this judge is just astounding. It could not be any more obvious. If there was ever a time to get the reputation back it’s now. The amount of corruption that seems to permeate the Karen Read case is staggering.

Other

Comment #: MA995
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I admit that this is my second review. I would just like to add that there is an overwhelming "appearance of impropriety" with Judge Cannone. Not all reviews live up to the required standard of this site, and I understand why they would be removed, however they do speak to the "appearance of impropriety" as perceived by a large majority of the public. Not only are laypeople viewing her actions as questionable, but numerous lawyers have spoken out in public and shared the public's view that something is amiss when it comes to impartiality and unbiased behavior befitting of a judge. There is no other place for us to express our concern. It is a perception that is backed by many people, whether they express themselves with intelligence and detailed, law-based reviews or not. We are concerned.

Other

Comment #: MA992
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Do NOT DELETE this review. This is ridiculous that the public cannot trust this website that rates judges to be honest.

Judge Beverly Cannone’s handling of the Karen Read trial has raised significant concerns regarding judicial fairness, bias, and ethical integrity. From pre-trial rulings to courtroom conduct, her decisions have repeatedly appeared to favor the prosecution, casting doubt on the impartiality of the judicial process.

Pre-Trial Issues and Questionable Rulings

1. Denial of Key Evidence for the Defense
One of the most alarming aspects of Judge Cannone’s handling of the case has been her rulings on evidence. The defense has repeatedly struggled to obtain crucial discovery materials, including police communications and forensic reports that could support Karen Read’s claims. Restrictions on evidence that might undermine the prosecution’s narrative create an unfair playing field and raise questions about due process.

2. Bias Toward the Prosecution
Throughout the proceedings, Judge Cannone has often ruled in favor of the prosecution while limiting the defense’s ability to present exculpatory evidence. The denial of key defense motions while readily accepting the prosecution’s arguments gives the appearance of partiality, which is especially concerning in a case with significant public and legal interest.

Courtroom Conduct and Procedural Concerns

1. Gag Orders and Media Manipulation
Judge Cannone’s handling of media access and public statements has also been problematic. She has issued rulings that limit the defense’s ability to discuss the case while allowing leaks and narratives from the prosecution to shape public perception. This selective restriction on free speech harms the transparency of the legal process.

2. Handling of Witness Testimonies
Witness testimonies have also been a focal point of controversy. Reports suggest that witnesses whose statements contradict the prosecution’s theory have faced significant hurdles, with some not being allowed to testify or being subjected to excessive scrutiny. In contrast, testimonies that align with the prosecution’s arguments have been given wide latitude.

Public Trust and the Question of Judicial Integrity

Judge Cannone’s conduct in this case has contributed to growing public distrust in the legal system. With mounting evidence of potential judicial misconduct, including the apparent shielding of law enforcement personnel and influential figures from scrutiny, there is a legitimate concern that justice is being obstructed rather than served.

Given the gravity of these issues, calls for accountability and oversight regarding Judge Cannone’s decisions are both warranted and necessary. This trial serves as a pivotal example of why judicial transparency and fairness must be at the forefront of legal proceedings, particularly in high-profile cases where the stakes are extraordinarily high.

Judge Beverly Cannone’s management of the Karen Read trial has been marred by rulings that suggest prosecutorial favoritism, restrictions on the defense, and procedural inconsistencies that undermine confidence in the judicial process. These concerns highlight the urgent need for judicial reform to prevent similar miscarriages of justice in the future.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MA978
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Do NOT erase any portion of this review!!

Judge Beverly Cannone’s Conduct Raises Serious Ethical Concerns!!!

Judge Beverly Cannone has repeatedly demonstrated conduct that violates key judicial canons meant to ensure fairness, impartiality, and integrity in the courtroom. Her handling of cases suggests a pattern of bias, lack of transparency, and failure to uphold the basic tenets of judicial ethics.

Violations of Judicial Canons:

1. Canon 1 – Upholding the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary

A judge must ensure public confidence in the integrity of the judiciary. However, Judge Cannone’s rulings and courtroom behavior have led to widespread complaints, raising serious concerns about her ability to remain neutral and fair.

2. Canon 2 – Avoiding Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety

Rather than maintaining impartiality, she has demonstrated favoritism in cases, often disregarding evidence or silencing parties who challenge her authority. This fosters the perception that justice in her courtroom is not applied equally.

3. Canon 3 – Performing Duties Impartially and Diligently

Judge Cannone has failed to provide fair hearings, frequently interrupting litigants and making decisions that seem predetermined rather than based on case facts and law. Reports suggest she disregards due process, an essential judicial responsibility.

4. Canon 4 – Conducting Extrajudicial Activities to Minimize Conflicts of Interest

The public has raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest in cases she presides over, further eroding trust in her ability to make unbiased rulings.

Her reputation among litigants, attorneys, and even colleagues has suffered due to these repeated ethical lapses. Judicial accountability is essential, and the overwhelming number of complaints against her should not be ignored. Judges should be held to the highest standard, and when they fail, they must be called out and investigated.

If you have had a negative experience in her courtroom, I encourage you to document it and file a formal complaint. Judicial integrity must be preserved, and judges like Beverly Cannone must be held accountable for failing to uphold their sworn duties.

Other

Comment #: MA975
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Judge Cannone has demonstrated gravely concerning levels of bias and unprofessionalism in her handling of the Karen Read case. From audibly sighing as though she has more important places to be to undressing defense experts with her eyes. She does not like the defense lawyers and it’s obvious. What kind of a judge allows a screenshot of a text message to be admitted as evidence in a murder trial?! What kind of a judge doesn’t care if video evidence is clearly edited or hidden altogether? Why can non-medical doctors testify as to causation of an injury…only for the prosecution? I’d call her a joke but nothing’s funny about the way she runs her court room.

Other

Comment #: MA973
Rating:1.0

Comments:
This judge’s actions are damaging public trust in the justice system.

Her lack of evidentiary hearings regarding multiple Brady violations and jury tampering. She stated information in her ruling on the motion to dismiss as facts or as “I don’t know why proctor withheld the videos”. Judge CANNONE, you know how we find out? We call an evidentiary hearing and flesh it out, along with who knew what when. My jaw hit the floor reading her ruling on the motion to dismiss. I mean I knew she was going to deny it, but did she even read it in its entirety before she signed her name to the bottom. She contradicts herself multiple times. But I guess I shouldn’t have expected anything less. First we need a
Medical doctor to look at injuries. Now we have a dog behavioral scientist that can take the stand - without a hearing. After the doctor for the defendant was subject to multiple hearings followed by “a close call” on her ability to testify.

I have tried to say that she is being fair, but this reason above made me lose it.

Instead of actual legit questions, she basically refers back to “Because I said so” (or mostly I am the gate keeper and have discretion). I believe she falls back on this because clearly the case law does not back up her actions.

Other

Comment #: MA959
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Shame on Beverly Cannone. She should have recused herself from the get go on the Karen Read case. There is clearly evidence that she KNOWS many of the people that are DIRECTLY involved. I sincerely hope others will be treated more fairly. What she says and what she does do not square, one bit! I also think she and her pal Morrissey should be investigated. Her "bedside manner" with her sighs and constant interruptions of the defense when she does no such thing to the prosecution is so obvious. Isn't there a code of ethics or governing body that can step in? This does not look for feel like the American justice system that I know. Good Ole Biased Bev, hope you can sleep at night. Actually, I don't but you must exhausted after your 5 hour days in court (11am starts, etc.)

Other

Comment #: MA948
Rating:1.0

Comments:
I’m a trail watcher and I do have to say that watching this case ( Karen Read ) I can’t believe the open Bias and the way she treats the defense versus the CW the openness and the down right blatantly way she speaks to defense is very unprofessional and makes her look like a very ignorant judge of the law. She even leads the CW when she thinks the she be objecting to something by asking them if they want to object, I have never ever seen anything like her and her actions. She should NOT be sitting on this trial it seems like she has something personal in this trial and she should be thrown off. They have asked her a few times and she has refused. Someone really needs to look into this judge and the way she has handled this trial

Other

Comment #: MA943
Rating:1.0

Comments:
It’s clear that many people are deeply frustrated with how the Karen Read case is being handled. From the judge’s blatant bias to the unequal treatment of defense and prosecution, this trial has been anything but fair. The refusal to recuse despite personal connections, the constant interruptions and disrespect toward the defense, and the clear favoritism toward the Commonwealth—this is not how justice is supposed to work.

The judicial system is meant to uphold fairness, not to protect those in power at the expense of a defendant’s rights. Every ruling, every objection sustained before it’s even fully spoken, and every roadblock placed in front of the defense further proves that this judge has no intention of allowing a fair trial. If this is what our justice system has become, then we should all be asking: where are the checks and balances? Who will step in to stop this?

This case is being watched across the country and beyond, and the message it’s sending is dangerous—justice is only for those with the right connections. This judge has made it clear she is not interested in truth, only in controlling the outcome. She should have stepped down long ago. Instead, she continues to disgrace the bench. If there is any integrity left in our system, she must be removed.

Other

Comment #: MA935
Rating:1.0

Comments:
As someone closely following the Karen Read trial, I am deeply disturbed by Judge Beverly Cannone’s blatant mishandling of this case. Her rulings, courtroom demeanor, and consistent bias toward the prosecution have turned what should be a fair and just proceeding into a travesty of justice.

1. Bias in Favor of the Prosecution
From the start, Judge Cannone has shown a clear and troubling bias toward the prosecution. She has consistently ruled against the defense on critical motions while giving the prosecution free rein, even when their arguments lack legal merit. She has also allowed the state to introduce questionable evidence while restricting the defense’s ability to challenge it.

2. Suppression of Exculpatory Evidence
Judge Cannone has repeatedly prevented the defense from presenting crucial exculpatory evidence, making it nearly impossible for Karen Read to receive a fair trial. Key evidence that contradicts the prosecution’s narrative has been downplayed, delayed, or outright excluded, raising serious concerns about judicial misconduct and obstruction of justice.

3. Unfair Handling of Witness Testimony
Witness testimony should be handled with neutrality, yet Judge Cannone has consistently given the prosecution’s witnesses preferential treatment. Defense witnesses face excessive scrutiny, objections are sustained against them at an alarming rate, and cross-examinations that could expose inconsistencies in the prosecution’s case are repeatedly shut down.

4. Failure to Address Corruption Allegations
The Karen Read case is riddled with serious allegations of police and prosecutorial misconduct, including tampered evidence and false statements. A fair and competent judge would ensure that these issues are properly examined. Judge Cannone, however, has ignored these concerns entirely, effectively shielding those accused of corruption from accountability.

5. Manipulation of Jury Instructions
Jury instructions are one of the most critical aspects of a fair trial. In this case, Judge Cannone’s instructions have been vague, misleading, and skewed in a way that favors the prosecution. Instead of ensuring the jury understands the reasonable doubt standard and the flaws in the state’s case, she appears intent on guiding them toward a conviction.

6. Denial of Defense Motions
The defense has filed multiple motions to dismiss unreliable evidence, compel discovery, and investigate possible misconduct—all of which have been swiftly denied or ignored by Cannone. Meanwhile, the prosecution’s motions are almost always granted without meaningful scrutiny. This double standard has effectively tied the hands of the defense while giving the state unchecked power.

Conclusion: A Judge Who Should Not Be on the Bench

Judge Beverly Cannone’s conduct in the Karen Read trial is a stain on the Massachusetts judicial system. She has demonstrated blatant partiality, ignored evidence of misconduct, suppressed exculpatory information, and compromised the defendant’s right to a fair trial.

If this is how she handles high-profile cases under public scrutiny, imagine the injustices taking place in her courtroom when no one is watching. This judge should be investigated, held accountable, and removed from the bench.

Rating: 0/10 – An absolute disgrace to the judiciary.

Other

Comment #: MA934
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Absolutely a biased judge!! ****Please be aware - Over 100 negative reviews against Judge Cannone was deleted from this website this morning **** Voices are being silenced about this judve

Other

Comment #: MA931
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Terrible judge. Biased. Needs removed from this bench.

Other

Comment #: MA927
Rating:1.0

Comments:
It’s so hard to watch this KR trial and not feel bad for the defense team and Karen. Judge Beverly has repeatedly shown so much biased that she needs to go back to law school and learn what rules of conduct are. She doesn’t give reasons for her not allowing something, she obviously hates Alan Jackson and Karen Read that she makes it easy for the
Prosecutor. She lets Hank Brennen lie intentionally (like a lot) but lashes out like a kindergarten teacher scolding her students. She made each defense attorney stand up and agree with her! They did nothing to deserve that! I think she needs to have a judge come watch the courtroom and watch her in action! She allowed an inverted video the prosecution brought in! Insane! So many things she has done that it makes you wonder how she is a judge? Oh wait I think Michael Morrisey was one that recommended her! That’s convient . This case has so much wrong with it a blind goat would refuse to prosecute. Bev and Hank are in cahoots with the DA! All 3 of them in statements very far apart from each other? I have grave concerns! Not the most widely used verbiage!

Please please please someone look into her conduct at the bench!

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MA919
Rating:1.0

Comments:
As an attorney, I expect judges to uphold the principles of due process, fairness, and impartiality. Unfortunately, Judge Beverly Cannone has repeatedly demonstrated a concerning pattern of judicial conduct that raises serious questions about her ability to preside over cases objectively.

In my experience, she has exhibited clear bias in her rulings, disregarded critical evidence, and shown a willingness to suppress testimony that does not align with her apparent predisposition. Rather than applying the law consistently, she appears to favor certain parties, creating an uneven playing field for litigants.

Moreover, her management of the courtroom is often arbitrary and unpredictable, making it exceedingly difficult for attorneys to advocate effectively for their clients. The number of complaints against her is not surprising, as her judicial temperament and rulings frequently fall short of the standard expected of a fair and impartial jurist.

For attorneys handling cases before Judge Cannone, I strongly advise meticulous preparation and vigilance, as procedural fairness may not be guaranteed. Litigants deserve better, and the legal community should not overlook the growing concerns regarding her judicial performance.

Other

Comment #: MA906
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Judge Bev Cannone months ago-
"Motion to obtain sallyport footage meta data denied."

Also Judge Bev Cannone 3/25/25-
"Evidentiary hearing and motion to dismiss is denied. Although KR discovery rights were in fact violated, defense hasn't proved any footage was manipulated."

Throughout her denial of an Evidentiary Hearing, she states multiple times that facts are unknown, and concludes that due to facts unknown, there will be no hearing. Make that make sense.

Other

Comment #: MA878
Rating:1.0

Comments:
There are people across the entire US & even in multiple other countries following this trial with their jaws on the floor. I don't know how many WTAF moments needs to happen before Judge Bias Bev gives a crap about a defendants rights. It's to the point that I don't care if this defendant killed 100 people this case should have been dismissed. Everyone already knew that this judge was never going to rule the way she should have. We also knew she wouldn't allow an hearing to get answers for the all the EGREGIOUS GOVERNMENT MISCONDUCT!! But I don't think anyone knew how bad she would vouch for & excuse the Commonwealth & all their shenanigans. I've never seen anything so blatantly obvious. The majority in this country are losing any trust in the justice system, Prosecutors, & even the Police.

Anyone that watches the pre trial #1 hearings (which Bias Bev showed her plan to put her thumb on the scales of justice to help the Prosecutor), the trial (as she sighs in the microphone, asks the prosecutor if he wants to object, prevents the defense from using relevant evidence, cuts the defense off as soon as they started making ground, & protected the witnesses & prosecutor & clearly tampered with the jury - removing jurors & the shady way she chose the alternates & forman) and now pre trial hearings for trial #2 (her disrespectful treatment of the defense & defendant, her going against her own prior rulings ONLY BECAUSE IT BENEFITS THE PARTY SHE IS HELPING, embarrassing & chastising the top professional defense attorneys, allowing Lanigan hearings for all the defense experts including ones that were already allowed in first trial & then putting in her ruling they were a close call and also adding things she thinks the prosecutor can attack on cross in her ruling, allowing the prosecutor to speak about things he never put in a motion and then taking his word even after he has been caught lying & misrepresenting a ton of what he is spewing, she makes the defense put everything in a motion otherwise they can't argue it, she refused to give the defendant a refund for $13k on am expert sent to look at video that wasn't there once he arrived & then after she denied the refund for the defendant the prosecutor miraculously found that video.

I could continue all day long and never have enough time & room to call out the LONG list of such EGREGIOUS violations. Attorneys around the world are saying it's something they have never seen in their career. Regular people have stopped watching & just read updates because it raises their blood pressure & stress levels. I have never seen a worse persecution. Where are the Feds? Who is going to finally be the hero and have the balls to stand up and do something? This judge needs removed from the bench yesterday.

She denied her own order asking her to recuse knowing the public was already claiming she was connected. It was further proven to be true. This judge REQUESTED this case. That should tell you everything. She has a plan & it's to help convict an innocent women to protect the guilty ones in that house.

More people wake up and see this daily. It's not going to go away. Judge Bias Bev doesn't deserve the robe she is wearing. She actually deserves an orange jump suit for violating the rights of the very person she took an oath to protect. I believe it is only out of jealousy due to seeing how successful the defense lawyers are from California, New York & Massachusetts & she was a public defender that was appointed judge yet these high priced attorneys with their own firms make more than she does. I can't understand why else she has such a hatred towards highly successful attorneys.

Every single criminal defense lawyer should show up to that courtroom and send a clear message to this disgusting judge. We can't allow a judge to reward Prosecutors & Police misconduct while punishing the defense & defendant for even a miniscule of an issue. It's absurd and if this continues & this judge is given qualified immunity then I would suggest everyone leave that rougue state.

Other

Comment #: MA877
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Subject: Formal Complaint Against Judge Beverly J. Cannone – Karen Read Trial

To Whom It May Concern,

I am writing to file a formal complaint against Judge Beverly J. Cannone in connection with her conduct during the Karen Read trial and retrial in Massachusetts. Judge Cannone’s actions represent a grave threat to the integrity of our justice system and the constitutional rights that every American is entitled to. Her consistent bias, disregard for due process, and alignment with the prosecution have made a mockery of this trial and deeply undermined public trust.

The following issues demonstrate the alarming pattern of misconduct and judicial overreach that demand immediate investigation:
1. Violation of Constitutional Rights: Judge Cannone repeatedly allowed the prosecution to suppress evidence that could favor the defense—clear violations of the defendant’s constitutional rights.
2. Undermining the Defense: She routinely permitted the Commonwealth to strategically undercut the defense’s arguments without regard for fairness or legal precedent.
3. Unjustified Rejection of Evidence: Exculpatory evidence presented by the defense was swiftly dismissed without proper explanation or justification.
4. Prosecutorial Misconduct Enabled: The prosecution was allowed to spin narratives and make unsupported claims without accountability or challenge.
5. Partiality Toward the Prosecution: Judge Cannone showed a clear bias in allowing the prosecution to defend third-party individuals potentially implicated in this case—departing from the prosecutor’s duty to seek truth and justice, not convictions at any cost.
6. No Consequences for False Statements: The judge permitted the prosecution to present false or misleading statements without affidavit and later amend them with no sanction or reprimand, despite admissions of error.
7. Misuse of Public Resources: She authorized the appointment of an outside prosecutor—at taxpayer expense—because no other Commonwealth prosecutor wanted to be associated with this deeply flawed case.
8. Double Standards: There was a blatant double standard in how the court treated the defense compared to the Commonwealth, compromising the fairness of the trial.
9. Improper Admission of Hearsay: Judge Cannone allowed hearsay from the prosecution without proper evidentiary support or sworn affidavits.
10. Open Disrespect Toward Defense: Her tone and treatment toward defense counsel and the defendant reflected open hostility and prejudice, in stark contrast to her demeanor with the prosecution.
11. Lack of Judicial Responsibility: She frequently shortened court days, disrupting proceedings and increasing financial strain on the defense, especially given the involvement of out-of-state attorneys.
12. Intentional Burdening of the Defense: The court’s schedule appears designed to drain Karen Read’s resources, further disadvantaging her ability to mount a defense.
13. Failure to Recuse Despite Conflicts: Judge Cannone has known associations with witnesses involved in this case and should have recused herself long ago to preserve impartiality.
14. Appearance of Corruption: There is growing public concern that she is operating in concert with DA Morrissey to shield key figures from scrutiny and ensure Karen Read is wrongfully convicted. This raises serious ethical concerns that must be addressed.
15. Facilitating a Cover-Up: The judge’s conduct appears to support a coordinated effort—alongside Prosecutor Hank Brennan—to protect powerful interests rather than uncover the truth.

The citizens of Massachusetts, and this country, deserve a justice system that operates with transparency, fairness, and accountability. At this moment, those principles have been trampled in the courtroom of Judge Cannone.

I respectfully request a formal investigation into her conduct and demand that appropriate action be taken to restore the integrity of this trial and protect the constitutional rights of the accused.

Sincerely,

Christina Detisch

Other

Comment #: MA876
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Judge Beverly Cannone is one of the worst judges I have ever seen. She is very unprofessional at how she talks the defense lawyers but when she talks to The prosecutors she very friendly and even asks them if they want to object. She acts like a member of the prosecution team against the defense it’s very weird and unsettling . She even laughed that at a pretrial hearing that the prosecutor lied to her about handing over evidence to the defense and the defense let her know and she Laughed about it but always lashes and speaks badly about the defense. This judge is either awful at her job, corrupt or biased, based on her rulings which half the time make no sense she seems to have rules for the defense and none for the prosecutor. She has made everyone afraid of our judicial system if all judges are like this. She needs to removed from the bench or placed in traffic court which I would be afraid for those who had to go infront of her even there.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MA867
Rating:1.0

Comments:
As a defense attorney, I have had the opportunity to observe and interact with numerous judges throughout my career. Unfortunately, Judge Beverly Cannone’s handling of cases raises serious concerns regarding due process, judicial impartiality, and defendants’ rights.

Judge Cannone has demonstrated a pattern of rulings that disproportionately favor the prosecution, often restricting the defense’s ability to present key evidence, cross-examine witnesses effectively, or argue critical motions. This imbalance directly undermines the adversarial process, which is essential for a fair trial. The role of a judge is to act as an impartial arbiter, yet too often, her decisions appear to align with prosecutorial interests at the expense of the accused’s constitutional rights.

Additionally, her courtroom demeanor has been described as dismissive and unapproachable, particularly toward defense counsel advocating for their clients. A fair legal system requires judges who are willing to listen to all parties, apply the law without bias, and ensure that justice is not only served but also seen to be served.

When judges fail to uphold these principles, it damages public trust in the judiciary and jeopardizes the rights of those who rely on the courts for a fair trial. Based on my experiences and those of my colleagues, I believe that a formal review of Judge Cannone’s judicial conduct is necessary to ensure that the rights of defendants are not being systematically eroded in her courtroom.

Court Staff

Comment #: MA862
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
As a court staff member in another jurisdiction, I have had the opportunity to observe and compare the practices of various judges, including Judge Beverly Cannone. Unfortunately, her handling of cases raises serious concerns regarding judicial integrity, courtroom management, and adherence to due process.

Judge Cannone has developed a reputation for rulings that appear to favor the prosecution at the expense of a balanced legal process. Numerous reports suggest that she routinely limits the defense’s ability to present key evidence or question witnesses effectively. Such practices undermine the fairness that our legal system is built upon.

Additionally, accounts from litigants and attorneys indicate that her judicial temperament is inconsistent with the standards expected of a fair and impartial judge. Courtroom proceedings under her oversight have been described as hostile and dismissive, particularly toward individuals who challenge her rulings or seek accountability.

A judge’s duty is to ensure that justice is administered fairly and without bias. When judicial conduct repeatedly falls short of these principles, it damages public trust in the courts. Based on observations and widespread concerns, a formal review of Judge Cannone’s courtroom practices may be necessary to restore confidence in the judicial process.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MA860
Rating:1.0

Comments:
As a legal practitioner, I have had the opportunity to observe Judge Beverly Cannone's courtroom conduct and judicial decision-making. Unfortunately, I have significant concerns regarding her ability to uphold the principles of impartiality, due process, and judicial integrity.

Judge Cannone has demonstrated a pattern of rulings that raise questions about her adherence to fundamental legal standards. In high-profile cases, she has exhibited deference to prosecutorial arguments while limiting the defense’s ability to present a full and fair case. This imbalance undermines the adversarial process and erodes public confidence in judicial neutrality.

Additionally, reports from colleagues and litigants suggest that Judge Cannone’s courtroom demeanor can be dismissive, particularly toward individuals who challenge her rulings or seek accountability. A judge’s role is to ensure fairness, not to impose undue restrictions that hinder the pursuit of justice.

The legal community relies on judges who apply the law consistently, free from external influence or personal bias. When judicial conduct repeatedly falls short of these expectations, it is imperative to call attention to such concerns. Based on observed proceedings and documented complaints, I believe a review of Judge Cannone’s performance is warranted to ensure that justice is not compromised in her courtroom.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MA857
Rating:10.0

Comments:
One of the best judges on the bench

Other

Comment #: MA844
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This Judge is biased [Redacted by Ed.] in her dealings with the CW v. Read case. She is very demeaning to the defense and defendant. Cannone seems to baby the CW and gas close ties with the DA of Norfolk County and some of its witnesses! She needs to recuse herself and somehow retire

Other

Comment #: MA784
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Bev,
Please educate yourself on the matters before the court before you make rulings. Your rulings have been spurious at best.

You're embarrassing yourself.

1) Attorneys can ask leasing questions on cross examination. Just because YOU think it's argumentative doesn't make it objectionable. And not allowing the basis of objections to be heard, you end up wasting more time at sidebar because you have to justify yourself, which, since you seem to be extremely defensive, comes across as petty.

2) 3rd party culprit evidence - in pretrial motions, you claimed you could exclude the evidence outright... If you want to get your verdict immediately appealed, then go right ahead. We all know you have a GREAT public appeal record.

3) Please be consistent when applying your rulings. When you hold one party to, I don't know, not "wasting time" or instructing then to move on, but then let another party talk at length, for hours, on anything not relevant to the case, you just appear to have no qualms giving them massive leeway.

4) You are obviously a control freak. That's going to get on your nerves, but you need to think about how that affects your bias. If someone presents facts or law alternative to your points, you need to be actually receptive, and not fake simperingly sweet. It comes off as pathetic.

In conclusion, either step down as you are very clearly unfit for your position or retire early. It would improve the justice system significantly.