"The Robing Room: MA State Judges

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Roanne Sragow

Comments

Litigant

Comment #: MA371
Rating:1.0

Comments:
This Judge is unethical, even sleazy. She is biased in favor of Jewish Complainants and Against Non-Jews. She has displayed personal animus against me. She has attempted to impose obligations of the Jewish Religion, upon me as a non-Jew, ordering me to remove from my Apt. Door, my Buddhist Scape-Pig, as offensive to Jews. The Scape-Pig is holy to some sects of Buddhism, and is believed to absolve babies, about to be born, from the inherited sins of their parents. The concept is similar to the Christian Sacrament of Baptism. Apparently, Judge Sragow does not give a damm for the religious freedom, diversity, enshrined in the First Amendment---or, she thinks it applies only to Jews. Shame on her!

Other

Comment #: MA68
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Judge Sragow presides as if she were unaware of the Constitutional Requirements of Due Process. On multiple occasions, she has refused to replace in-competent and ineffective attorneys, connected to a criminal matter, with an indigent defendant.