Hon. Christopher J. Muse See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Middlesex County
Woburn
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   3.0 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Christopher J. Muse


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: MA357
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
We had the unfortunate opportunity of appearing before Judge Muse on several occasions. You can add a bias against pro se litigants to the list of complaints. Here is what's unique: we won our appeal against him, and it contained bias as part of the appeal, complete with quotes right from the transcripts. He had to have had some ego to make them on the record. We could repeat, but will instead second, what attorneys on this site have said about him. All of the documents of our case are at http://plaintiffs.jetiii.com (we won our First Amendment motion). Also, I was interviewed by uswatchdogs.net, who have numerous stories about this judge. He is getting bad enough to conjure up memories (that you older attorneys will remember) of the impeachment of Judge Shirley R. Lewis.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MA321
Rating:1.8
Comments:
The worst judge that I have ever been in front of. He lacks professionalism as well as a good temperament. He is also extremely rude, abrasive, and hostile. He is unfair and biased, and does not wish to be challenged.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MA196
Rating:2.9
Comments:
I don't understand why he is on the bench - every ruling in which I have been involved is a head scratcher.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MA112
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
If you have a dog of a case, pray for this judge. He seems ignorant of the law, but decides upon his own strange criteria.
The WORST judge I have had the misfortune to come before.

Litigant

Comment #: MA93
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Careful of this Judge. He shoots from the hip and couldn't be bothered by the facts/law when decided.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MA67
Rating:4.5
Comments:
Absolutely the worst judge I have been in front of. Asks a question and cuts you off after one sentence of answering. Would rather hear himself speak than hear an explanation. Is condescending, favors older attorneys at the expense of younger ones, quotes nonsensical passages of gibberish to make himself sound smarter.