Hon. Timothy Q. Feeley See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Worcester County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

What others have said about Hon. Timothy Q. Feeley



Comment #: MA373
Rating:Not Rated
In addition, the proof is in comparing transcripts of what was said in comparison to response by Judge Feeley, which may need further review. Courtroom demeanor was patient.


Comment #: MA372
Rating:Not Rated
Found information he provided back to me inconsistent with what I had stated


Comment #: MA131
Rating:Not Rated
Extreme prejudice against pro se litigants, especially when public officials are being sued. He has no respect for rules or laws and will make extremely vague arguments in order to make clear-cut, black-and-white rules or laws "difficult" to apply. He has no obvious intention to enforce law, only what he deems law according to his over bloated ego. absolutely not trust worthy and is unable to understand concepts as simple as 8 days being longer than a 5 day period when determining whether or not a default occurred...particularly when it is attorneys or police officers who have defaulted. He works to protect violence and terrorism within the justice system.