Hon. Robin Dana Gill Bright See Rating Details
Circuit Judge
Circuit Court
Prince George's County
7th Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.2 - 4 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   3.0 - 4 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Robin Dana Gill Bright


Comments


Other

Comment #: MD8372
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Hon. Judge Robin Dana Gill Bright I want to thank you for making me feel like an adult male human being yesterday morning at 10am doing my divorce proceeding. I had bad representation from my attorney throughout the whole process of my divorce. She treated me like a child and talk to me with an nasty unprofessional attitude. Yesterday in court you made me feel like I was worth something. My case was handle unfair and unprofessional. for one the payments I was giving is to high for me to afford. My attorney did not fight to have it affordable for me. This putting me at risk in being in contempt of court. I want to thank you for explaining every detail information I needed to know and understand. You are a great understanding Judge that respect the well being of others. Thank you!!!

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD8313
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Poor excuse for a judge. Prince George's County is one of thee most disapointing and unprofessional courts systems that exist.It makes sense that she's a judge here.

Other

Comment #: MD8311
Rating:2.0
Comments:
Judge Bright displays clear bias towards women, and completely disregards evidence that would hurt the female's case. Her rulings seem to have more of a personal sentiment than a professional one. Her behavior proved to be less than professional and lacks a necessary level of patience a judge should have. This is unfortunate because as citizens we are urged to do things the "proper" way and not take matters into our own hands. Judges like Robin Bright completely discourage any natural instinct one would have to do things the "proper" way.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD8307
Rating:1.9
Comments:
Very rude and impatient. Very disrespectful to lawyers - yells and argues with attorneys inappropriately. Points can be made without the constant yelling. Her behavior was embarrassing. Appears biased toward attorneys who practice in PG County.

Litigant

Comment #: MD8164
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Robin Dana Gill Bright is a judge for the Seventh Circuit Court in Prince George's County in Maryland. This judge was bias and unfairly dismissed my case because the defendant's lawyer asked her too and they didn't have an expert to go against my case.

Other

Comment #: MD7861
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This "Judge" is demeaning, hostile, uneducated, unprofessional, bias, discriminatory, impatient. She should not be trusted on the bench, or anywhere for that matter.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD7524
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judges very confused And organized She is made me lose confidence in the judicial In court she openly admitting that she was confused About what's going on in the case Seemingly having no understanding about rule of law She also need to go to family law counciling Having very little understanding about family Law was very unhappy with This judge's demeanor Appearing to listen in to only one sided the Stories

Other

Comment #: MD6091
Rating:1.0
Comments:
U[Redacted by Ed.] judge that pushes docket through the court without hearing both sides FAIRLY!! She also discrimated against the men in the courtroom, specifically telling the men that we have to tuck our shirts in or we will not have our case heard!! There were no signs posted outside of the courtroom stating that but that's what she wanted. There were women in the courtroom dressed in men like fashion (button down shirt and slacks) but she said nothing to them at all!! [Redacted]

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD5298
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Lacks basic knowledge of law other than moving criminal cases through the docket. No experience outside of being a paper pusher / former prosecutor. Was not known to be bright at all. Can we try some reverse discrimination in this predominantly black county. So tired of incompetent judges - who are mostly in PG County and this judge is without doubt one of them.