Hon. L. Bruce Wade See Rating Details
Associate District Judge
Circuit Court
Wicomico County
1st Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   8.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. L. Bruce Wade


Comments


Other

Comment #: MD8083
Rating:1.0
Comments:
He has a systemic racists appearance. An appearance that very strongly suggest “guilty before proven innocent” especially if you are an individual of color! I am very dissatisfied with him presiding over cases involving young men of color. It’s my personal feeling he envisions these young individuals as a menace to society, rather than providing an alternative to incarceration! He doesn’t consider the same young first time offenders, presented with the opportunity, a strong family support system could very well become a very successful person. Grandparents and/or parents aren’t given the opportunity to speak in defense of juveniles of color before being rudely interrupted by this judge. Some people have no idea who sits on the other side of the desk? God bless this man!????