Hon. Michael J. Stamm See Rating Details
Associate Circuit Judge
Circuit Court
St. Mary's County
7th Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   9.6 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Michael J. Stamm


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD8308
Rating:9.6
Comments:
A pleasure to appear before. Judge Stamm is extremely patient and fair. One of the best Circuit judges in the State.

Litigant

Comment #: MD6645
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge is rude and female-centric, he has approved the extension of a protective order against me, one that I consented to and had NO FINDING OF ABUSE, with NO legal reasoning, my estranged wife has made no attestation of abuse or threats, after submitting several exhibits and examples as to why this should not legally be extended, the JUDGE DID IT ANYWAY... I am already in the process of launching a formal complaint and petitioning an investigation in to judicial oversight and misuse of authority against this judge.

Other

Comment #: MD2382
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Extremely biased against fathers in divorce cases. Will bend over backwards to avoid hearing contempt charges brought against women and minors!