Hon. Daniel O'Fallon See Rating Details
Judge
District
Anoka County
10th
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Daniel O'Fallon


Comments


Other

Comment #: MN51
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Went to Jr and Sr High with this bozo. If I can find the party photos from Blazes party I’d bet he’d resign tomorrow

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MN30
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
He's an awful Judge who should not be allowed in the courtroom. He is biased against me and ruled against me at every turn. He informed my attorney he does not care what my side is and refuses to hear my side which is a violation of the Judicial Rules of Conduct. He has made derogatory remarks about me and has allowed my grand daughter to live with a pedophile (her step dad) whom has had 2 CPS charges against him from different people. He does not care about the well being of my grand daughter he is concentrating all his efforts on me. My ex son in law has lied and lied and OFallon sides with him. Again never allowing me to prove my innocence.

Other

Comment #: MN18
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Signed off on search warrants based on impartial witness (sister-in-law.) Probable cause item one cites here-say, "Concerned Citizen says she never saw it but was told where it was."
My sister in law broke into my house, then proceeded to report what she found.
Violation of due process, I should add however, Anoka county has no due process and most defendants are expected to plead guilty.

Other

Comment #: MN6
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Poor interface with plaintiff - Overpowering, does not let the plaintiff follow presentation - Turns the case into a question answer format - seemingly in a hurry to end the process. Impatient. Not recommended