Hon. K. Elizabeth Davis See Rating Details
Circuit Judge
Circuit Court
Clay County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   8.9 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. K. Elizabeth Davis


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: MO256
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I am involved in a child custody and support case that has been going on for over two years now. This judge has blatantly ignored the other party's multiple incidents of perjury under oath. That same party has violated court orders (without incurring a single contempt order), and false accusations against me have been used to slander me repeatedly in court, and the judge allows it. There have been multiple visits from CPS over the past two years, and not a single shred of concern has been voiced by these professionals, ever, but the judge won't consider that as evidence to disprove the false accusations. I have been forced to choose to either give in to all the demands of the other party, or have a guardian ad litem appointed by this judge, with only five minutes to decide. I chose the GAL, instead of letting the other party railroad me. There is no hope with this judge on the case.