Hon. Linda Marquis See Rating Details
Judge
District Court
Clark County County
Eighth Judicial District
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   2.0 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Linda Marquis


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: NV165
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Doesn't put child first! Definitely doesn't look at evidence like police reports and is quite arrogant about her not having to following the law . She's awful, a monster. Definitely not worthy of wearing a robe. Hope she burns in hell.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NV141
Rating:2.1
Comments:
Is Extremely Biased against men. Causes litigants extreme pain and suffering, especially denying them their children, for profit. Does not do whats in the best interest of children! Should not be a judge!

Other

Comment #: NV139
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Highly condescending, assumes facts not in evidence, denied continuance/forced a party who was left without counsel due to surprise death of counsel to defend themselves on a motion to show cause from which they faced the possibility of jail time despite an admitted expectation that the defending the facts alleged to oppose a motion to show cause could be self-incriminating and put a litigant in the Hobbesian choice of providing a potentially self-incriminating statement without counsel after having requested to wait for counsel or forfeiting the right to be heard and present a defense to the show cause hearing motion. Instead, Judge Marquis simply ordered defendant to not present his side due to his being pro se and then using that to find against him and order a show cause hearing. Judge Marquis also decided other substantive issues affecting the defendant's rights explicitly based upon a presumption of the allegations defendant was precluded from defending against due to not having advice about managing potentially self-incriminating statements, which were relied on ahead of the evidentiary hearing.

Civil Litigation - Govt.

Comment #: NV138
Rating:1.9
Comments:
Completely Biased, Favors Women in custody matters, Tears families apart!