Hon. Sharon N. DeVries See Rating Details
District Court Judge
County Court
Rockingham County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   2.7 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Sharon N. DeVries


Comments


Other

Comment #: NH89
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I am stunned at the outright bias she displays. She ignores evidence, doesn't allow evidence to be introduced, relies on facts not in evidence, insults people openly in court and violates the constitutional rights of litigants. Why is she in this position?

Litigant

Comment #: NH84
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Very biased and favors certain plaintiffs.

No class at all. Ridicules others in the court room in front of everyone.

Definitely a bully type person

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NH82
Rating:2.7
Comments:
This judge has been around for a while. She started as a part-time judge, pulled the right levers and is now drawing a full paycheck, traveling the circuit. She has very little real-life experience, and no legal scholarship at all. When she tries, it's painful to watch.