Hon. Estela M. De La Cruz See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Bergen County
Vicinage 2
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   2.6 - 6 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Estela M. De La Cruz


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NJ562
Rating:1.4
Comments:
Complete incompetent. Should not be on the bench. She is lazy, arrogant, simple minded and nasty. Most dangerous part about her is that she thinks she's smart. One of the worst judges I've encountered in 18 years.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NJ560
Rating:1.7
Comments:
Poor judicial temperment. She is short tempered with counsel and is not overly courteous. At many times, she was outright nasty and there was no basis for such conduct by a Judge. She jumps to conclusions without giving the parties a fair opportunity to be heard. She stalls off issuing rulings or doing any work to narrow the scope of the litigation. This is the wrong Judge for any sophisticated commerical litigation.

Civil Litigation - Govt.

Comment #: NJ398
Rating:1.0
Comments:
TELL ME THE ATTORNEYS AND I WILL TELL YOU WHO WILL WIN. This woman is a disgrace to the bench. She and her brother have been public servants since day one of their careers. If it weren't for affirmative action and the kissing up she does to the politically connected, she would be nowhere. She wanted to be a Federal Judge, but they didn't want her. SHE WILL DO ANYTHING TO MAKE SURE THE RIGHT SIDE WINS. AND SAD PART IS, SHE THINKS SHE'S BRILLIANT. If you appear before her, make sure you have one of "her bubby bubby lawyer friends" or you will be doomed from the start. NASTY and UNPROFESSIONAL and always wrong. Is her reversal rate still one of the highest in the State?

Other

Comment #: NJ350
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
As a trial lawyer I have had very good experiences before Judge de la Cruz. She lets the attorneys make their arguments, is smart, and treats people with respect. On those rare occasions when I have not prevailed, at least I know she treated me fairly.

Civil Litigation - Govt.

Comment #: NJ332
Rating:1.4
Comments:
Disgrace to the bench. Motivated by politics and who can better her career. I am in the process of investigating her ties and connections based on how she decides her cases. Ex parte communication. Disgrace.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NJ233
Rating:1.3
Comments:
A career public "servant" who serves only herself. A disgrace to the bench.