Hon. Nancy Sivilli See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Essex County
Vicinage 5
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Nancy Sivilli


Comments


Other

Comment #: NJ2170
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Unable to mange cases in a timely fashion. Erratic decisions, filled with contradictions, without support or explanation. Series of problems decisions. Sivilli’s orders are much worse than many orders that come out of family courts - frequent violations of a parent’s rights papered over by words with no scientific basis.
Judge Sivilli has caused much pain and suffering to families struggling through divorce. But this judge has created a boom for lawyers and "experts".
The Kleinman case was the epitome of corruption, overreach and disgrace that no family should ever suffer.
http://www.dpdlaw.com/Kleinman.html
Recently, Judge Sivilli attempted to surpress the first ammendment rights of a father struggling for his custody rights through due process.

Other

Comment #: NJ2169
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Unable to mange cases in a timely fashion. Erratic decisions, filled with contradictions, without support or explanation. Series of problems decisions. Sivilli’s order looks very much like many orders that come out of family courts. It was little more than a frank violation of a parent’s rights papered over by words with no scientific basis.
Judge Sivilli has caused much pain and suffering to families struggling through divorce. But this judge has created a boom for lawyers and "experts".
The Kleinman case was the epitome of corruption, overreach and disgrace that no family should ever suffer.
http://www.dpdlaw.com/Kleinman.html
Recently, Judge Sivilli attempted to surpress the first ammendment rights of a father struggling for his custody rights through due process.

Other

Comment #: NJ2168
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Unable to mmange cases in a timely fashion. Erratic decisions and contradictions, without explanation. Series of problems with decisions. Sivilli’s order looks very much like many orders that come out of family courts. It was little more than a frank violation of a parent’s rights papered over by words with no scientific basis.
Judge Sivilli has caused much pain and suffering to families struggling through divorce. But this judge has seen a boom to lawyers and "experts".

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NJ873
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Bad judge. Always late. Does not read papers. Does not apply law. Favors litigants and attorneys with greatest political clout. Poor demeanor. Wild hair that stands on end. Dingy and sallow appearance. Slouches on the bench. Gets impatient and rests forehead on bench. Leans into her hand. Does not care. Litigants leave with sense of injustice.