Hon. Lorraine Pullen See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Middlesex County
Vicinage 8
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   3.3 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Lorraine Pullen


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NJ4497
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Totally incompetent.

Worst judge I've ever seen.

Lazy beyond lazy and retaliatory.

needs to be in prison

Other

Comment #: NJ2582
Rating:1.0
Comments:
In reviewing a first-time drug offender who violated probation with dirty urine tests, she would not read any letters written on defendant's behalf, either submitted by IOP counselors, the director of the program, or family members. The young lady has shown major progress, works a program and got a steady job. What does Judge Pullen do? Puts her in jail and no court date until Jan. 2017. Amazingly ineffective for the addicted of our society!

Litigant

Comment #: NJ1251
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge is a disgrace to the bench. She is biased, mean spirited and doesn't bother to explain her decisions. She was a disaster in family court and they are fortunate she is gone.