Hon. Jamie S. Perri See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Monmouth County
Vicinage 9
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   7.1 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 4 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Jamie S. Perri


Comments


Other

Comment #: NJ1146
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Incompetent or very dishonest and mean.

Other

Comment #: NJ1059
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She is either incredibly incompetent or very dishonest and mean. She ruled incorrectly on several simple matters.

Other

Comment #: NJ1045
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Incredibly incompetent or very dishonest and mean.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NJ1042
Rating:4.4
Comments:
A very Pro-plaintiff Jurist. As another commenter mentioned, she took on the Herculean task of cleaning up a littered docket, to the detriment of litigants' rights and professionalism toward attorneys. Justifying inconsistent positions and emotional, knee-jerk rulings that fly in the face of the basic Judicial ethics for the sake of her reputation as a Docket Cleaner borders on --nay, crosses the border into-- Judicial misconduct. Shameful.

Other

Comment #: NJ675
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She is either incredibly incompetent or very dishonest and mean. She ruled incorrectly on several simple matters.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NJ439
Rating:9.8
Comments:
Excellent jurist, pleasure to work with and was clearly short changed after her valiant effort to effectively reform one of the most back logged dockets in the State.