Hon. Honora O'Brien Kilgallen See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Monmouth County
Vicinage 9
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   5.7 - 6 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   3.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Honora O'Brien Kilgallen


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: NJ4806
Rating:1.0
Comments:
~I'm a Retired Police Officer,Judge Honora O'Brien Kilgallen is NOT worthy of her position, She takes advantage of male Pro-Se Respondents , She does Not decide cases on facts & evidence, she picks a target ( usually a male ) and then does everything in her power to find judgment against them, I had filed a motion before her with compelling evidence of Police Reports , Tape Recordings , Grand Jury & Deposition Transcripts , She actually had the nerve to say to me she didn't read my motion or review my evidence, She completely ignored the blatant & confessed perjury of the other party & cherry picks through the documents that supports her "Pro-Feminist Agenda", A male doesn't stand a chance at a fair & impartial hearing before her, Request a different Judge, I have to say The NJ family court system is a joke, The DV Advocates in the courtrooms openly conspire with the females in these matters,telling them in the court prior to the hearings to use the words fear & distress often so that the judge can rubber stamp a TRO. The NJ Family Court Proceeding are The Most Unconstitutional I have ever scene in my 30 years in Law Enforcement.

Litigant

Comment #: NJ4208
Rating:9.0
Comments:
Extremely fair, courteous, respectful and just. Took the time to read all the paperwork, and all the evidence presented and did not allow any interruptions from either side to ensure that everyone received their time to speak. Level-headed and impartial based her decisions on fact not emotion and maintained order and respect during the proceeding. No excuse and no nonsense kind of judge and made sure to hold both parties accountable as opposed to just one.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NJ3847
Rating:1.4
Comments:
Has intense hate to men especially minority men

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NJ723
Rating:2.7
Comments:
A true liberal with her own adgenda for using the Courts to legislate. If your a mom or female you will always win.

She need to go.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NJ669
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She is disrespectful and rude. She has a superior attitude that she is not worthy of having. She also let abuse of a child go on in her Court rooms. She is a disgrace.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NJ561
Rating:10.0
Comments:
An excellent, fair, extremely well prepared and courteous judge. She read ALL the papers for a huge summary judgment motion and made the right decision, which required a lot more work on her part.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NJ484
Rating:9.3
Comments:
An ideal Judge. Fair minded, intelligent, prepared and courteous.

Litigant

Comment #: NJ226
Rating:1.0
Comments:
During restraining order hearing, insensitive to defendant joking about rape. Blamed plaintiff/applicant for defendant's actions.