Hon. Katherine R. Dupuis See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Union County
Vicinage 12
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Katherine R. Dupuis


Comments


Other

Comment #: NJ1457
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I can't believe this judge favored the bank (Wells Fargo) in my case -- they are holding a fraudulent, illegal document that was found in a court of law to be so. The loan was closed in 2009 and forgiven by the bank, so as to hide it from the government or just get rid of the bad loan like they did with so many others. The lawyers took over to see what they could get for themselves to make their pockets bigger. I just wanted my house and what they promised me. I didn't want to go through all this stuff. I don't want any money; I just want my house. What they promised me was $1113.00 principal and interest -- that's what it said on the contract and that's what I should've got, but instead I got $1113.00 deferred interest only in my first bill. They should follow through on what they promised. They (Wells Fargo) claim that my wife and I are a part of a class action lawsuit, and that we should go after the broker. They also say that we won against the broker and should get money from them. First of all, the brokers for some reason can screw hundreds of people and close their doors and open up under a new name and do it all over again and get away with it with no penalties. Even though we won, we can't collect anything because of what they're allowed to do. Secondly, as far as the class action lawsuit is concerned, we never got anything in the mail or by e-mail or certified mail or even by phone to tell us that we are a part of this class action lawsuit. What I guess I'm trying to say is: the bottom line is that this bank (Wells Fargo) is holding a fraudulent document, and no matter if they bought it in bulk or bought it singly, they have it, and according to the law, fraud is fraud and you can't make good on that, because if you try you go to jail. For example: it's like me having a big company and buying ten tractor trailers of sneakers, and one of the trailers was full of bootleg sneakers, and I decide to sell them anyway. What do you think would happen to me? I would get slapped with big fines and go to jail, that's what would happen. The judge, Katherine R. Dupuis, decided in favor of the bank anyway, after hearing all that. What don't you understand, Judge Dupuis? Fraud is fraud, and they're holding that document, and you're letting them get away with selling my house that I lived in for thirteen years. You are a very bad person, and you are arrogantly ignorant as to the facts. The bank has 95 class action lawsuits that they lost because of the same thing -- don't you read the paper or listen to the news? This was an open and closed case, and my wife and I are the victims in this case. The bank should go after the broker -- oh, that's right, they can't because they are closed so they came after me. And that's somehow fair to you? It makes me kind of wonder how much the banks are paying? Anybody can see that they're clearly at fault, and are responsible for what they bought from Wachovia Bank -- they knew what they were buying, everybody knew what they were buying. You are a very bad person to make my family suffer like this.

Other

Comment #: NJ921
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
A radical femi-Nazi. Judge Dupuis is totally blinded by estrogen. If you are a male defendant do not expect anything like impartiality. Judge Dupuis will act as prosecutor and Judge. Want a travesty of justice.