Hon. Craig L. Wellerson See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Ocean County
Vicinage 14
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   4.6 - 7 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Craig L. Wellerson


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: NJ4836
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I thought maybe it was just me. But after reading the comments here, I can see that I have once again been cursed with a lousy judge. This guy is a piece of work. Very wrongly granted SJ in case with a slew of disputed material facts. It was shocking, quite frankly. It is sad that we are subjected to this kind of treatment. It's a disgrace. Overall, the NJ Court system is pretty horrible

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NJ4814
Rating:1.0
Comments:
He routinely pre-judges cases. He’ll waive away black and white evidence that disproves his initial thought. While he is very smart, and can potentially be a good judge, unfortunately he’s a disgrace to our legal system. Anybody that doubts me can easily look up how often he gets appealed.

Court Staff

Comment #: NJ3917
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Totally inept, impossible someone with so little intelligence is a judge, should be cleaning toilets maybe, but a judge. NO WAY

Other

Comment #: NJ3644
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
You can't find a dumber human being dressed up in his little robe.

Where do they find these corrupt morons?

That's what I want to know.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NJ2135
Rating:4.2
Comments:
This Judge has let his power go to his head. Seems to generally dislike being a Judge. He is condescending to both sides and thinks everyone in his Courtroom is wasting his time.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NJ2096
Rating:5.3
Comments:
This guy is an emotional roller coaster. Stay on his good side. I think he's actually fairly smart, but if you piss him off, he will screw you. Too defense oriented as well.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NJ2027
Rating:9.8
Comments:
He is well schooled in the rules of evidence. He knows His stuff and handles trials in a professional competent manner.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NJ555
Rating:1.9
Comments:
This...person is the most ridiculous excuse for a judge. Basically, a self-absorbed useless waste of bench space. Any pre-trial evidence, supporting documentation, etc. is wasted on this loser. He's a joke, has no opinions for his dumb decisions and should not be in a court room unless he's a defendant. None of his decisions are based on any facts, evidence or law. In summary, he's a complete joke.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NJ451
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Absolutely horrible. Failed to follow the rules of evidence, failed to consider the actual evidence, disregarded undisputed facts, and reached conclusions that neither party even argued. Largely wasted parties' time by pre-judging matter, but then requiring oral argument - which he promptly cut short.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NJ330
Rating:9.1
Comments:
Judge Wellerson is one of the best trial judges out there. Handles the jury well and is fair, attentive and engaging during trial. He is a straight shooter and I can not say enough good things about him as a trial judge.