"The Robing Room: NJ State Judges

Hon. Madelin F. Einbinder	See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge Superior Court
Ocean County Vicinage 14	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: - 0 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: 1.0 - 4 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Madelin F. Einbinder

Comments

Litigant

Comment #: NJ4937
Rating:1.0

Comments:
These judges are real gems. They have ZERO regard for the children of divorced parents. This Judge has no issue with taking a mother's parental rights away without any justification. I'm not a drug addict or into anything that would deem me unfit yet this woman judge would prefer to have my ex that is an abuser have custody over our child. Why? Because he is filthy rich and I have no money. She follows the money and could care less about fostering healthy relationships between the children and BOTH PARENTS. My heart breaks for the families that have to deal with this judge and her abusive behaviors.

Court Staff

Comment #: NJ4803
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Unbelievable the retaliation against one plaintiff in conspiracy with Judge Hodgson with a mother who everyone in this entire building knows is a prostitute, yet she gets a Fee Waiver while claiming to be "self-employed) with no income, which they all know is a lie, then Hodgson retaliates against the father, who is disabled and can't work by denying with a line of questions that is not allowable under NJ Supreme guidelines. This makes me sicker than I was before [Redacted by Ed.]
They can't violate the equal protections rights of one person in retaliation for him filing corruption complaints against Judges here, which is exactly what they are doing.

Someone should lock them up for a very long time.

Other

Comment #: NJ4729
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Reading these comments and ones of other NJ judges it is apparent that it's time to start electing judges. [Redacted by Ed.] I say this because she follows no rules or laws. She's pathetic

Court Staff

Comment #: NJ4622
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
It took her one day to start conspiring with that low life Hodgson to ruin people's lives and the lives of their children.

Both of them are a total disgrace to the judicial system.

I'm embarrassed to work here

Other

Comment #: NJ4615
Rating:1.0

Comments:
BIAS, BIAS, BIIIIAAASSSSS JUDGE! How these Ocean County Judges get away with their bias statements and inappropriate behaviors is unreal. Because there is a shortage of judges doesn't give them an excuse to behave unethical and retaliate against parties. This judge should be sanctioned for her failure to follow federal laws.

Court Staff

Comment #: NJ4213
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Can't believe she's actually a judge, no ability at all, retaliates against people who stand up. Complete disgrace.

Court Staff

Comment #: NJ4083
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I'm actually hearing her conspire to deny a father the right to parent his child because he's asking to see his child now. She can't figure out how to make it look like it's OK, and is saying she can't stand this person and will screw him at any cost.

WITH A CHILD INVOLVED, she has a personal grudge that overrides her Duties as a Judge. This is unbelievable

Court Staff

Comment #: NJ4070
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I can't imagine anyone more unintelligent except Marlene Lynch-Ford. How in the world these idiots even have jobs is beyond my comprehension. I just witnessed her not even read anything and make a ruling so blatantly biased against a father, it makes me ashamed to work here.

Other

Comment #: NJ3945
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Worst most biased judge. She should not be on the bench making any rulings or findings. She is rude in nature and in general not a nice person.