Hon. Paul X. Escandon See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Monmouth County
Vicinage 9
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   4.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Paul X. Escandon


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: NJ4404
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Allowed fraud in a case by the defendant in case number MON-DC-4220-16. Had a case and there was a trial that should not have happened.

Court Staff

Comment #: NJ3734
Rating:1.0
Comments:
How is it even possible this person is a judge? He barely knows the law, doesn't follow the Court Rules. My husband is an attorney and when I tell him what I see daily he tells me to call the cops

Litigant

Comment #: NJ2257
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
His decisions are biased, prejudiced and illegal. Ordering a wife to remain in the same house for her entire life despite the husband not paying her a penny is what he ordered. He should be removed from the bench. He does not understand how matrimonial law works and rules for the husbands, despite their physical abuse and restaining orders, all of the time.

Other

Comment #: NJ2014
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
They need to put this judge back into family court. He, I believe is the only judge in Monmouth County who is not bias. He is the only judge willing to be gender neutral regarding custody and issues regarding equitable distribution in family court matters.

Other

Comment #: NJ1941
Rating:10.0
Comments:
I believe this judge is the only one in Monmouth County who actually was unbiased in family courts. I believe he was removed from family courts because he did not use gender as a basis for custody.We need more judges who are like this judge.