Hon. Michael E. Hubner See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Morris County
Vicinage 10
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   3.6 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   2.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Please type what you see below:


What others have said about Hon. Michael E. Hubner


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NJ2295
This judge never looked at any evidence. Is forcing me to continue to pay for a 23 yr old without any medical evidence. We had all the evidence. Immediately found for the woman. He should be disbarred. There is no way he read any of my evidence.


Comment #: NJ2183
I agree with the prior comment that the judge ignores the details. As a rule the "devil is in the details". Rather than understand the details he took the easy way out and simply pointed us back to the original agreement. The unfortunate thing is that the ambiguity of the original agreement was why this was being litigated in the first place. In his Statement of Reasons he never referred to contested issue - leading me to conclude he didnt take the time to read the complaint to a point of understanding.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NJ2109
The judge needs to slow down and pay attention to all of the facts of a case, rather than zooming in on one or two facts and ignoring the rest. Great temperment, very personable, but we feel this judge overlooks some important items and it seems unfair on balance.