Hon. Christopher D. Rafano See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Middlesex County
Vicinage 8
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Christopher D. Rafano


Comments


Other

Comment #: NJ2111
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Rafano slammed me in Family Court. He is a disgrace to the bar. It's Ironic, one of my female friends had the same issue and her attorney was from Hogan & Longo as well. My ex-husband lied in every order to show cause, and my daughter told the Guardian ad Litem the truth. Rafano, with his lack of knowledge of family law forbid me to see my child. He discriminates against me. I've been left with no choice but to file civil suits against all parties involved.

Other

Comment #: NJ2016
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This new judge shows signs of bias,and doesn't seem to want to work well with people who represent themselves. I can't even get an oral hearing with him, plus I don't think he looks over the important facts of my case. He even went and changed the $30,000 imputed income that the divorce judge ordered against my ex wife and lowered it to $18,000 all based a fraudulent tax return, my God she didn't even report my $13,000 in alimony. And the biggest joke is the C I S my ex spends $39,000 a year this in her own hand writing, so how does this happen. I will never give up, even if it means going to the appellant court. The truth of my ex's crimes will come out.