Hon. Christopher D. Rafano See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Middlesex County
Vicinage 8
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   2.0 - 8 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Christopher D. Rafano


Comments


Other

Comment #: NJ2520
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Mr. Rafano does not deserve the title of judge. He is bias and should be removed the bench. If you are unfortunate not to be able to afford council, be prepared to lose your case. I have now lost my house and cannot afford rent. I am convinced Mr. Rafano does not have a single ounce of empathy in his body. RUN from this so called judge, RUN FAST!!!! BTW, read ALL the reviews. See anything in common??? If this was YELP this business would be closed by now!

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NJ2502
Rating:1.0
Comments:
was a single mother who raising a son by her self the father has never seen the child and he is now 12years old. Since I fled for modification in 2013, judge Rafanot is 100% with the father and refused to give me my chid support. Judge Rafano also ruled that I should pay the father seventy thousands for day care because I could not provide nine years of day care receipt and asked me to pay the father lawyer fees or five thousand six hundrend . I applied and every decision he made was reversed so I have no idia what you are talking about but I bet you are white because this judge is not competate and Chris Christie should had never hired prosecutor with no judge experience to a family court. After I won the appealed, he is still refusing to calculate my support and now he is using fraud that I did not put my house on my support when the father was not paying me his child support for 4 years and lied that he was not working. This judge is a discrase to the law. We have to go back to the appealled to ger me a judge not him.

Litigant

Comment #: NJ2497
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Anyone who complains about Judge Rafano is probably nothing short of being a loser/dead beat. Judge Rafano is an excellent Judge who is very fair with his rulings.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NJ2496
Rating:1.0
Comments:
He is the wost recist and bias judge and he lacks knolege and not compitent

Other

Comment #: NJ2495
Rating:1.0
Comments:
No wonder Chris Christie will never be a governor in NJ again how can he picked such an incompetate judge that will not even follow the apeallet rulling. He is twisting it in his own way and saying that the appeallet rulling were wrong . Judge Rafano should be remove from beig a judge and she should never be a judge especially for family division.

Other

Comment #: NJ2381
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Extremely poor. My lawyer failed to show up and this judge would not allow me to postpone the session to get proper representation, which is a violation of my civil rights. He also seemed to have a bias relation to my ex's lawyer.He should be removed from the bench before he ruins other families. I called Trenton and gov. Chritie appointed him to the bench. RUN from this judge! If I could give a zero I would!!!!

Litigant

Comment #: NJ2235
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge Rafano is by far the best Judge in Middlesex County. He doesn't tolerate people who lie to him. He has excellent demeanor, listens to the facts of the case and rules appropriately. I only wish he handled my divorce, I probably would have not spent over 2 years in litigation. Judge Rafano is handling post judgment matters for me. Family Court is extremely difficult especially when your dealing with people who lie endlessly and try to take advantage of the court system. If he is your Judge, and you are honest and sincere, you will have a great outcome. Good luck.

Other

Comment #: NJ2232
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Rafano does not follow case law, even after it is spoon fed to him. He is bias and does not put facts above his own personal feelings. He does not care about domestic violence or the welfare of children, his only objective is not to keep a father away from his children regardless of the facts presented to him. He uses bits and pieces of the law to support his rulings. I hope he realizes when something bad happens to the women or children it will be on his hands. He is a disgrace to the judicial system and I will write to every oversight comite, regulatory agency and newspaper that will listen. You must remember at the end of the day he is still only one man who answers to someone. He is not the Law and he can be brought down. I pray his ruling in my daughter's case is over turned on appeal which is a strike against him. It does not look good for them when one of their cases is over turned. I hope he runs for public office one day because I will be sure to oppose him.

Other

Comment #: NJ2227
Rating:1.0
Comments:
A judge is suppose to listen to the facts and be unbiased and he does not. I hope his is removed before he continues to do harm.

Other

Comment #: NJ2226
Rating:1.0
Comments:
read the other reviews and agree. I am still dealing with him. I don't know if he is misogynistic,racist, incompetent or all. The Ex was lying, when I told Rafano he was lying he looked and him and said are you lying and he said no. Rafano then looked at me and said he is not lying. I said I have proof etc. and he said not now. Told him the ex submitted fraudulent tax income Rafano ignored me. Another time when I had a lawyer she told Rafano that he was showing prejudice against her client (me)and he totally blew her off. She later explained to me that he is biased against people who have lawyers because the other person can't defend themselves as well. I dropped her, I couldn't keep paying her and it made no difference to him. It didn't matter what I submitted to the court he doesn't read it doesn't care.

Other

Comment #: NJ2111
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Rafano slammed me in Family Court. He is a disgrace to the bar. It's Ironic, one of my female friends had the same issue and her attorney was from Hogan & Longo as well. My ex-husband lied in every order to show cause, and my daughter told the Guardian ad Litem the truth. Rafano, with his lack of knowledge of family law forbid me to see my child. He discriminates against me. I've been left with no choice but to file civil suits against all parties involved.

Other

Comment #: NJ2016
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This new judge shows signs of bias,and doesn't seem to want to work well with people who represent themselves. I can't even get an oral hearing with him, plus I don't think he looks over the important facts of my case. He even went and changed the $30,000 imputed income that the divorce judge ordered against my ex wife and lowered it to $18,000 all based a fraudulent tax return, my God she didn't even report my $13,000 in alimony. And the biggest joke is the C I S my ex spends $39,000 a year this in her own hand writing, so how does this happen. I will never give up, even if it means going to the appellant court. The truth of my ex's crimes will come out.