Hon. Samuel J. Ragonese, Jr. See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Camden County
Vicinage 4
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   4.6 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   3.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Samuel J. Ragonese, Jr.


Comments


Other

Comment #: NJ2356
Rating:1.0
Comments:
judge ragonese had no interest in hearing either side of the case in my custody dispute... I was the last case of the day, and he didn't let neither of us speak our case, just demanded that we seek mediation and walked out. I have already attempted compromise with other party and had proof which he would not look at... he failed me and my child as a judge.

Litigant

Comment #: NJ2145
Rating:6.0
Comments:
No idea, nor the desire to hear the law, concerning home schooling in NJ. He totally denied our constitutional right to home school as well as another litigant ahead of us. Thank God there are attorneys and Judges in NJ who know & uphold these laws.