Hon. Marcia L. Silva See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Middlesex County
Vicinage 8
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Marcia L. Silva


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: NJ2281
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I was blindsided by my ex when in court for another issue and was smacked with an order to show cause before walking in the courtroom. He had a lawyer since he knew what he was planning to do to me and I did not, as I was not prepared for what he was going to do to me. The judge immediately saw him as the "better party" because he could afford a $500 an hour lawyer, and made an opinion on me. She cut my parenting time with my 8 year old girl from 60% to 13% because all I can afford is a one bedroom apartment and my ex was able to get on low income housing and had two bedrooms. She allowed my ex to claim that he makes $33K a year, when he actually earns $34 an hour, that would be equivalent to about 15 hours a week of work. She did not deem this a under-employed.Though 8 years ago when we divorced he was capable of making $50K a year. She was nothing but degrading to me the entire proceeding, and has put an 8 year old girl in the hands of a father that only wants her for the money. I get an hour with my daughter 2 times a week and every other Friday and Saturday night. How that is in the best interest of an 8 year old girl I don't know. Apparently in the eyes of this judge a wall between beds is more important than a daughter being with her mother. I have lost ALL faith in the legal system due to the power given to this inexperienced judge, who has forever changed my life as well as my daughters.

Litigant

Comment #: NJ2106
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Fair and kind. I am a man and was surprised by her ruling. I have been brutalized in Middlesex county family court for 4 years. Silva was the first judge to rule in the best interests of my child. Lord Bless Judge Silva and I pray she stays on the bench.

Other

Comment #: NJ2019
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Sexist, biased, does not know the law she is suppose to enforce. Will not enforce prior court orders (including her own). Cannot handle complex issues. If you are a man going before her, keep it at an elementary school level.