Hon. Deborah Silverman-Katz See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Camden County
Vicinage 4
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   9.6 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Deborah Silverman-Katz


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NJ3573
Rating:10.0
Comments:
It's too bad that we don't have more judges of this caliber. Probably the best in the County.

Other

Comment #: NJ2928
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Very attention hungry and inept. If you dont even look to acknowledge her she will get upset.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NJ2126
Rating:9.2
Comments:
Excellent well-prepared judge who has read the papers before the oral argument on a summary judgment motion, asks appropriate questions that show she has read the papers, is prepared to rule and is not afraid to grant sj when warranted. This shouldn't be rare, but it is.