Hon. Stephanie M. Wauters See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Ocean County
Vicinage 14
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 4 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Stephanie M. Wauters


Comments


Other

Comment #: NJ2245
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Has tortured my neice and sister with her refusal to deal with fact and has allowed the continued poisoning of the children to the point where, by the fathers decree, they don't want to see/reunificate with the mother.

She is despicable!

Litigant

Comment #: NJ2217
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She is biased towards mothers and rules from her beliefs not from case rulings. She should not be reelected to family court!!

Litigant

Comment #: NJ2141
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She did the same thing to me. She made decisions based on her own opinions of me and also tried to make DCPP open a fn case against me. They refused because they didn't want to get themselves I'm trouble. She left me with with no recourse.

Litigant

Comment #: NJ2030
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge violated civil and constitutional rights. Based decision on hearsay alone, refused to look at documents in front of her.