"The Robing Room: NJ State Judges

Hon. Stephanie M. Wauters	See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge Superior Court
Ocean County Vicinage 14	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 1.3 - 1 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: 1.0 - 5 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Stephanie M. Wauters

Comments

Court Staff

Comment #: NJ4042
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Needs to be ousted and imprisoned for what she does to people and their children.

I'm ashamed to be in this court, the things that go on in Ocean County make me sick, and this one and Marlene Ford are the worst offenders

Other

Comment #: NJ3656
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
She is a horrible human being. I've watched a piece of paper from a lawyer being handed over to the court clerk and the clerk winked at the defenses lawyer & that's when that judge went against me. She tried to rob me of precious time with my child who was only 5mths at the time. She sided with the father who was on probation at the time who was charged for drug offenses, who mentally and physically abused me. A man who only went to court to get visitation for his parents. A man who now has drug and weapon charges still going on his life. She doesnt care about anything but herself. She violated civil & constitutional rights..It's disgusting how anyone would even make that woman a judge.

Other

Comment #: NJ3552
Rating:1.0

Comments:
This evil person should not be living off the backs of tax payers. She should be in prison!!!

Other

Comment #: NJ3125
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I am happy she is not ripping children from their kids anymore. She is biased and does not care about the children. In our case her mind was made up the first 3 minutes of the case. I wonder if she knows or even cares how many families she destroyed. Do not use her for anything.

Other

Comment #: NJ2312
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
She is destroying my whole family. She is torching my niece, who is an excellent mother. She took my nieces and nephew away from their mother, who was a respectable teacher and has not seen her kids in over a year. She "RIP" the baby out of her mother's arms. NO VISITATION...WHAT KIND OF JUDGE DOES THAT. She does not follow the law when hearing her cases. She favors the fathers over the mothers. She is not fair (and I could go on) and should be remove from the COURTS for her actions. She should not be able to rule on cases. She does what she wants and doesn't follow guidelines/law. She doesn't even read the papers involving the case. REMOVE HER

Other

Comment #: NJ2245
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Has tortured my neice and sister with her refusal to deal with fact and has allowed the continued poisoning of the children to the point where, by the fathers decree, they don't want to see/reunificate with the mother.

She is despicable!

Litigant

Comment #: NJ2217
Rating:1.0

Comments:
She is biased towards mothers and rules from her beliefs not from case rulings. She should not be reelected to family court!!

Litigant

Comment #: NJ2141
Rating:1.0

Comments:
She did the same thing to me. She made decisions based on her own opinions of me and also tried to make DCPP open a fn case against me. They refused because they didn't want to get themselves I'm trouble. She left me with with no recourse.

Litigant

Comment #: NJ2030
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Judge violated civil and constitutional rights. Based decision on hearsay alone, refused to look at documents in front of her.