Hon. James M. Blaney See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Ocean County
Vicinage 14
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 8 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. James M. Blaney


Comments


Other

Comment #: NJ2082
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judges such as this need to step down, and let others who are more evolved and recognize the true horror that animal abuse really is.

Other

Comment #: NJ2081
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Until Animal Abusers are held accountable for their actions crimes like this will continue to happen. Judges like James Blaney are part of the problem.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: NJ2015
Rating:1.0
Comments:
No justice at all for Sammy!!! Irresponsible judges like you set back animal rights by decades! Shame on you!

Other

Comment #: NJ1937
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I can't believe what you did for Sammy the cocker spaniels abusers. What kind of a message are you sending to other abusers? They just have to have excuses?? and that makes it okay? Why wasn't their other dog abused as well? Your ruling was inexcusable.

Other

Comment #: NJ1934
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This is because of his reversal in the case about Sammy the Cocker Spaniel. What was done to him deserved YEARS in jail, but NJ law in inadequate. So what did Judge Blaney do? He OVERTURNED THEIR JAIL SENTENCE, which was already terribly inadequate!!! He's should be removed from the bench!

Other

Comment #: NJ1932
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I am horrified by your ruling on the appeal of the Morgans. It was heartless and without merit. The original sentence was not even harsh enough but for you to excuse incarceration and financial penalty is abhorrent. What kind of justice system could ever be considered fair with this kind of ruling? This judge should be ashamed of himself

Other

Comment #: NJ1923
Rating:1.0
Comments:
If you read his record, you will note that this judge tends to sympathize with defendants. He is not fair and equal. (See the case of NJ vs. Morgans (Sammy).)

Other

Comment #: NJ1922
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I just cannot understand your ruling in the Morgan animal abuse case. Pathetic, is all I can say. You, sir, will have to answer to your Maker on Judgement Day for all of the damage that you have allowed to continue to happen to abused animals everywhere. Shame on you.