Hon. Mark K. Chase See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Camden County
Vicinage 4
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   5.0 - 4 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Mark K. Chase


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: NJ4672
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Very Interested in doing the right thing

Litigant

Comment #: NJ4642
Rating:1.0
Comments:
He is a biased, discriminative judge. He is against women and against minority. He was very nice to the opposing party (white male) and did what's convenient for the other party. Completely ignored the facts and my testimony. He believed in the drama put out in the court room. Discredited licensed and experienced therapist's testimony regarding the child and acted as a therapist himself. I was taken insincere because I kept my attitude professional, rational, and fact-based.

The other party had a burden to prove but did not, but the Judge ignores the procedure and the steps of consideration.

He is ruining my son's life by sending my son from a great school district to a lowest area to live with a person who wanted to terminate the parental rights before.

If you get this judge, put a drama. That's what he believes.

Litigant

Comment #: NJ3091
Rating:1.0
Comments:
The worst family judge I have ever seen. He is completely against women. He allowed my ex to introduce whatever evidence he chose to. But I was barely allowed to speak. He talked right over me. He doesn't listen to evidence he was completely wrong in my situation. Time will tell. I pray that he just goes away. He has single handedly ruined my life. He should not be a judge.

Other

Comment #: NJ3040
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Very insightful judge who has an extensive understanding of family law. I spent the last year and a half fighting to maintain custody of my son, and Judge Chase saw right through my narcissistic ex. His main priority is to rule in favor that is in the best interest of the child. My circumstance was very unique, and thanks to Judge Chase I was able to keep full custody of my son. He’s very thorough and conscientious in his rulings.