"The Robing Room: NJ State Judges

Hon. Andrea I. Marshall	See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge Superior Court
Monmouth County Vicinage 9	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 5.5 - 3 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: 1.0 - 1 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Andrea I. Marshall

Comments

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NJ4851
Rating:9.0

Comments:
Judge Marshall is truly impressive. You can tell she reads everything and that she really puts a lot of time and thought into her opinions. Her temperament is excellent, yet she does not tolerate nonsense. I cannot say enough about her.

Other

Comment #: NJ3682
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Filed a motion ex husband never replied so motion was unopposed and she still denied me.and thats because the judges are all corrupt and are hand picked by politicians who received large sums of contributions from them. Most of them cant get a decent legal practice and they are losers who buy their jobs and are owing to politicians. So if your ex is an attorney or has substantial money you are screwed. All these judges are whores

Other

Comment #: NJ3663
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Just another politcally appointed judge who either gave money to a political candidate and got her job. Thats the pathetic thing about these judges. They actually payed to get their jobs. Bet alot of you dont realize that. These judges were not put there for their integrity and experience.absolutely the opposite they are lawyers who are conndcted politically and are awarded for their political financial contributions. So how could any citozen expect honesty fro.m any of them some politician has them in gheir pockets. Reform the court system and have these judges be reputable knowledgeable ETHICAL Judges not political hacks who are obsessed with power

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NJ3608
Rating:4.0

Comments:
Judge Marshall refuses litigates rights of discovery on family law matters particular ones involving United national security issues Title 50 US Code Section 3024 and 6 USC Section 121 d(11) and sets up illegal seizure of national intelligence assets involved in a foreign national attack using WannaCry virus of an AT&T facility in Middletown See Belfer vs Marshall D.D.C. Case 1:18-cv-00108-UNA. and Belfer vs Toscano 3:18-CV-05403. DNJ. and Belfer vs Toscano:18-CV-5101 SDNY Fortunately the family matters has been resolved and the US national intelligence asset has been re-united with his family member but after cost to the State of Colorado.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: NJ3250
Rating:3.5

Comments:
really snappy. sometimes its funny to watch but in general she means well. She can get Plaintiff/Defendant confused so make sure you reference the name with their position, ie: Plaintiff Rob...Defendant Janet...etc. I threw her for a loop when I corrected my position. ---I am not the litigious one! *oh......hmmmmmmm....I must rethink this whole thing....so your arent the crazy one*.... and oddly, I think the whole case made more sense after I made that correction. I think. still before her. we shall see. Just focus on facts. seriously, cut through the cloud. understand abusers and gaslighting and it will all be transparent. the truth is short afterall. rambling is deflection of facts. always be weary of ramblers. truth prevails

Other

Comment #: NJ3114
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Doesn’t look at the evidence. Completely unfair. Nothing matters to her.

Other

Comment #: NJ3101
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I was in her court on Sept 30th, 2018. I was the last person she saw. She is very patient, calm, good listener. She is beautiful and after looking into her eyes, I see she is very honorable and faithful person.

Even though she didn’t grant me restraining but my wife she went in court on Oct 2nd, lied in the court and got restraining orders against me. It shows me there is no place of truth in this court system. Justice is blind.